December 2016

Table of Contents - PeerJ Preprints

December 6, 2016 - Version: 2
, , , ,
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2615v2
December 1, 2016 - Version: 1
, ,
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2613v1
December 8, 2016 - Version: 1
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2628v1
December 17, 2016 - Version: 3
, ,
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2626v3
December 8, 2016 - Version: 2
, , , , ,
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2007v2
December 17, 2016 - Version: 1
,
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2639v1
December 6, 2016 - Version: 1
, , , , , , ,
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2620v1
December 21, 2016 - Version: 1
, , , , ,
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2661v1
December 18, 2016 - Version: 2
, , ,
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2447v2
December 21, 2016 - Version: 1
, ,
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2658v1
December 17, 2016 - Version: 1
, ,
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2640v1
December 12, 2016 - Version: 1
, , , ,
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2635v1
December 21, 2016 - Version: 1
, ,
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2665v1
I told my colleagues that PeerJ is a journal where they need to publish if they want their paper to be published quickly and with the strict peer review expected from a good journal.
Sohath Vanegas,
PeerJ Author
View author feedback