Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

The complete mitochondrial genome of Brama japonica

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1667v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Fenfang Chen performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables.

Hongyu Ma conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Chunyan Ma performed the experiments, analyzed the data.

Heng Zhang contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools.

Mengdi Zhao performed the experiments.

Yongyong Meng performed the experiments.

Hongqing Wei performed the experiments.

Lingbo Ma conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper.

Animal Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

Our project was approved by East China Sea Fisheries Research Institute.

DNA Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of DNA sequences:

GenBank (KT908039)

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

GenBank (KT908039)

Funding

This work was supported by the National Science & Technology Support Plan (2013BAD13B04), the National Basic Research Special Foundation of China (2013FY110700), the Special Scientific Research Funds for Central Non-Profit Institutes (2015M07), and the National Infrastructure of Fishery Germplasm Resources. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies