Visitors   Views   Downloads

The role of Twitter in the life cycle of a scientific publication

View preprint
"a department to rapidly generate, share and refine new ideas; an informal arena for the pre-review of works in progress; communicate research to a broad audience of researchers, decision makers, journalists and the general public" https://t.co/cUTUhM2Zn0 via @PeerJPreprints
RT @alexandralw2: @EMARIANOMD @GuiDuprat @subatomicdoc You’re welcome, the source is (couldn’t read initially :-) https://t.co/Je9W7QY5fq #…
RT @alexandralw2: @EMARIANOMD @GuiDuprat @subatomicdoc You’re welcome, the source is (couldn’t read initially :-) https://t.co/Je9W7QY5fq #…
@EMARIANOMD @GuiDuprat @subatomicdoc You’re welcome, the source is (couldn’t read initially :-) https://t.co/Je9W7QY5fq #hmieducators
The role of Twitter in the life cycle of a scientific publication https://t.co/4P3DyAFC97 via @PeerJPreprints
@DrCraigMc @TrevorABranch Here's some more: "The role of twitter in the life-cycle of a scientific publication" https://t.co/cZ3DYEgTDH "The social biology professor: Effective strategies for social media engagement" https://t.co/L27xWbm7Q7
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Additional Information

Competing Interests

There are no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Emily S Darling conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper.

David Shiffman conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper.

Isabelle M. Côté conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper.

Joshua A Drew conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper.

Funding

The study was self funded.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies