NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Eocene tarpons from the North Sea region - Poster SVPCA 2015

Poster presented at SVPCA 2015

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1410v1/supp-1

Eocene tarpons from the North Sea region - 3D reconstruction VIDEO

3D reconstruction VIDEO

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1410v1/supp-2

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Maria E. C. Leal conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Bo P. Schultz conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Henrik Madsen contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Chiara Villa performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Niels Lynnerup performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Niels Jørgen Rosenkrants performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Ulrich Veje performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Niels Bonde conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Funding

M.E.C.L is supported by a CNPq/ FUNCAP grant [grant numbers CNPq/ 305426/2014-1 and DCR- 0024-01186.01.00/14]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
  Visitors   Views   Downloads