Testing the grouper biocontrol hypothesis: A response to Mumby et al. 2013
Author and article information
Abstract
Biotic resistance is the idea that native species negatively affect the invasion success of introduced species. We tested the hypothesis that native grouper are controlling the abundance of exotic lionfish on Caribbean coral reefs by assessing the relationship between the density and biomass of lionfish and native predators at 71 reefs in three biogeographic regions. Our results indicated that: (a) the abundance of lionfish and large grouper are not negatively related, and (b) lionfish abundance is controlled by a number of physical site characteristics, and possibly by culling. Taken together, our results suggest that managers cannot rely on native grouper populations to control the lionfish invasion. Mumby et al. (2013) objected to several aspects of our analysis and conclusions. Here we address their criticisms and argue that our original conclusions are valid.
Cite this as
2013. Testing the grouper biocontrol hypothesis: A response to Mumby et al. 2013. PeerJ PrePrints 1:e139v1 https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.139v1Sections
Additional Information
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests. John Bruno is an Academic Editor for PeerJ. Lad Akins works for REEF and William Precht works for Dial Cordy & Associates.
Author Contributions
John F Bruno conceived and designed the experiments, wrote the paper.
Abel Valdivia conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper.
Serena Hackerott conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, wrote the paper.
Courtney E Cox performed the experiments, wrote the paper.
Stephaine Green performed the experiments, wrote the paper.
Isabelle Côté wrote the paper.
Lad Akins performed the experiments, wrote the paper.
Craig Layman contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper.
William Precht contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper.
Grant Disclosures
The following grant information was disclosed by the authors:
National Science Foundation (OCE-0746164 to CAL and OCE-0940019 to JFB)
National Geographic Society Committee for Research and Exploration (grant 8514-08 to JFB)
Funding
This work was funded in part by the National Science Foundation, the National Geographic Society Committee for Research and Exploration, a NSERC Canada Graduate Scholarship (to SJG), the Rufford Small Grants Foundation (to CEC), the Royster Society Carol and Edward Smithwick Dissertation Fellowship (to AV), and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.