Download
Share
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Testing the grouper biocontrol hypothesis: A response to Mumby et al. 2013

, , , , , , , ,
1 Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
2 Department of Marine Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
3 Department of Zoology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA
4 Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada
5 REEF, Key Largo, FL, USA
6 Reef Environmental Education Foundation, Key Largo, FL, USA
7 Department of Applied Ecology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
8 Dial Cordy & Associates, Miami, FL, USA
DOI
10.7287/peerj.preprints.139v1
Published
Accepted
Subject Areas
Aquaculture, Fisheries and Fish Science, Biodiversity, Conservation Biology, Ecology, Marine Biology
Keywords
lionfish, biotic resistance, coral reef, invasive, predator, management, null model, invasion biology
Copyright
© 2013 Bruno et al.
Licence
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Cite this article
Bruno JF, Valdivia A, Hackerott S, Cox CE, Green S, Côté I, Akins L, Layman C, Precht W. 2013. Testing the grouper biocontrol hypothesis: A response to Mumby et al. 2013. PeerJ PrePrints 1:e139v1

Abstract

Biotic resistance is the idea that native species negatively affect the invasion success of introduced species. We tested the hypothesis that native grouper are controlling the abundance of exotic lionfish on Caribbean coral reefs by assessing the relationship between the density and biomass of lionfish and native predators at 71 reefs in three biogeographic regions. Our results indicated that: (a) the abundance of lionfish and large grouper are not negatively related, and (b) lionfish abundance is controlled by a number of physical site characteristics, and possibly by culling. Taken together, our results suggest that managers cannot rely on native grouper populations to control the lionfish invasion. Mumby et al. (2013) objected to several aspects of our analysis and conclusions. Here we address their criticisms and argue that our original conclusions are valid.

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests. John Bruno is an Academic Editor for PeerJ. Lad Akins works for REEF and William Precht works for Dial Cordy & Associates.

Author Contributions

John F Bruno conceived and designed the experiments, wrote the paper.

Abel Valdivia conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper.

Serena Hackerott conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, wrote the paper.

Courtney E Cox performed the experiments, wrote the paper.

Stephaine Green performed the experiments, wrote the paper.

Isabelle Côté wrote the paper.

Lad Akins performed the experiments, wrote the paper.

Craig Layman contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper.

William Precht contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper.

Grant Disclosures

The following grant information was disclosed by the authors:

National Science Foundation (OCE-0746164 to CAL and OCE-0940019 to JFB)

National Geographic Society Committee for Research and Exploration (grant 8514-08 to JFB)

Funding

This work was funded in part by the National Science Foundation, the National Geographic Society Committee for Research and Exploration, a NSERC Canada Graduate Scholarship (to SJG), the Rufford Small Grants Foundation (to CEC), the Royster Society Carol and Edward Smithwick Dissertation Fellowship (to AV), and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
Download
Content
Alert
Just enter your email

Download article

Testing the grouper biocontrol hypothesis: A response to Mumby et al. 2013
PDF Save to Mendeley RIS XML BibTeX
3 Citations   Views   Downloads