Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Sylvie Gobert conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper.

Gilles Lepoint conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

João Silva conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Rui Santos conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Pierre Lejeune analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Patrick Dujardin analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Bruno Delvaux analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Jean-Thomas Cornelis analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Jonathan Richir conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper.

Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

Orbi

Funding

Funding was provided by the University of Liege (Fonds spéciaux C-10/78), the Territorial Collectivity of Corsica and the French Water Agency. This study is part of the STARECAPMED project. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies