Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Jaime Bernardeau-Esteller conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Rocio García-Muñoz performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Lázaro Marín-Guirao performed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Jose Miguel Sandoval-Gil performed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Ruiz Juan Fernandez conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Field Study Permissions

The following information was supplied relating to field study approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

The General Directorate of Fishery Resources and Aquaculture of the Spanish Ministry of the Environment and the General Directorate of the Environment of the Regional Government supported the field sampling performed in the declared Zone of Special Bird Portection Isla Grosa (ZEPA ES0000200) of the Natura 2000 Network.

Funding

This study form part of the project Monitoring network of P. oceanica meadows and global climate change of the Murcia Region funded by the Autonomous Government of the Murcia Region (General Directorate of Lifestock and Fishery) and the European Fishery Fund (EFF 2007-2013). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies