Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM

View article
RT @JohannaMappes: These reviewer comments are really disturbing. All of us who work as editors in scientific journals must systematically…
reply repost on X like
RT @JohannaMappes: These reviewer comments are really disturbing. All of us who work as editors in scientific journals must systematically…
reply repost on X like
1553 days ago
RT @JohannaMappes: These reviewer comments are really disturbing. All of us who work as editors in scientific journals must systematically…
reply repost on X like
1553 days ago
RT @JohannaMappes: These reviewer comments are really disturbing. All of us who work as editors in scientific journals must systematically…
reply repost on X like
RT @JohannaMappes: These reviewer comments are really disturbing. All of us who work as editors in scientific journals must systematically…
reply repost on X like
RT @JohannaMappes: These reviewer comments are really disturbing. All of us who work as editors in scientific journals must systematically…
reply repost on X like
RT @JohannaMappes: These reviewer comments are really disturbing. All of us who work as editors in scientific journals must systematically…
reply repost on X like
RT @JohannaMappes: These reviewer comments are really disturbing. All of us who work as editors in scientific journals must systematically…
reply repost on X like
These reviewer comments are really disturbing. All of us who work as editors in scientific journals must systematically filter unfair and disturbing comments and ban unprofessional reviewers! Reviewers: be rigorous, be fair, but be kind! https://t.co/Efe19F4yOs https://t.co/N3uzPgAQdq
reply repost on X like
https://t.co/pquB83ZEky (also, this happens so often than I may need to start retweeting this article every week)
reply repost on X like
@ShaneBDuggan @LVereenooghe @dsquintana These comments have also been reported to disproportionately affect underrep’d groups: https://t.co/ozOftwylvb
reply repost on X like
1650 days ago
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
reply repost on X like
@jamesheathers ...forgot links. I’m out for my evening walk & distracted by a couple of gents blabbering their opinions on the latest episode of my favourite podcast https://t.co/ozOftwylvb https://t.co/CXyQmXLSSg
reply repost on X like
RT @biolumiJEFFence: ...and be sure to check out our new paper at @RIPRJournal quantifying professionalism in #PeerReview: https://t.co/CXy…
reply repost on X like
1671 days ago
RT @antigonasegura: Las revisiones negativas escritas de forma insultante o condescendiente afectan nuestra confianza y en algunos casos no…
reply repost on X like
Las revisiones negativas escritas de forma insultante o condescendiente afectan nuestra confianza y en algunos casos nos alejan de la ciencia. Las poblaciones más afectadas por esto son justamente las que estamos subrepresentadas en la ciencia. https://t.co/wwryuP8FNG
reply repost on X like
...and be sure to check out our new paper at @RIPRJournal quantifying professionalism in #PeerReview: https://t.co/CXyQmXLSSg A perfect read combined w/ @NSilbiger & @Amber_D_Stubler's article in @thePeerJ: https://t.co/ozOftwylvb
reply repost on X like
RT @syn_efou: If you think you got mean reviews, take a look at this amazing collection in Figure 1 of this paper: https://t.co/h9LzzIpToN…
reply repost on X like
1678 days ago
If you think you got mean reviews, take a look at this amazing collection in Figure 1 of this paper: https://t.co/h9LzzIpToN And please remember, "don't be a prig in peer review": https://t.co/5hUvHRkW3I
reply repost on X like
1678 days ago
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
reply repost on X like
RT @OpenSci_UCSF: And, unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM, as found in this @thePeerJ stud…
reply repost on X like
1681 days ago
RT @LeonidTiokhin: "The first author is a woman. She should be in the kitchen, not writing papers."
reply repost on X like
"The first author is a woman. She should be in the kitchen, not writing papers."
reply repost on X like
1683 days ago
RT @OpenSci_UCSF: And, unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM, as found in this @thePeerJ stud…
reply repost on X like
And, unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM, as found in this @thePeerJ study (there are some examples of awful comments received, sheesh!) https://t.co/omYPackw8L
reply repost on X like