O artigo de hoje é sobre o impacto negativo que a revisão por pares feita de modo não profissional gera nas pesquisas STEM feitas por pesquisadores pertencentes a minorias sociais... as imagens falam por si só. Depois faço um vídeo sobre isso!
https://t.co/Fgk8s01V5t https://t.co/rJdBpyscyO
If we really want increased female and minority participation in publishing and academia, don't we have have a responsibility to try and stop the behavior that contributes to pushing them out? /3
https://t.co/Z44siFNrq2
If we really want increased female and minority participation in publishing and academia, don't we have have a responsibility to try and stop the behavior that contributes to pushing them out? /3
https://t.co/Z44siFNrq2
Source:
https://t.co/s58QB1nrXp
A climate that requires “toughness” and a thick skin to survive will disproportionally favor those who do the bullying.
Now that you know, you can stop. If you can manage not to shoot the messenger in the process, that’d be great, too.
@NeedhiBhalla Thanks for collecting all of this info! It’s nice to have a single place to send the doubters.
More bias in publication cites:
https://t.co/9yKhS5Ugi8
https://t.co/6yKR0KYxv5 (see fig 1 for
@DMillardHaskell WTF Dave? Nature had a long history of publishing & promoting eugenics garbage, plus it's well documented that there is lots of biased gate-keeping in publishing!
https://t.co/7X0ef6hSSz
https://t.co/tpZmievghd