Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM

View article
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
reply repost on X like
1037 days ago
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
reply repost on X like
1037 days ago
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
reply repost on X like
1038 days ago
Peer review as institutionally enforced twitter harassment. https://t.co/vxiixcDd1V https://t.co/zxLTAltIss
reply repost on X like
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
reply repost on X like
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
reply repost on X like
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
reply repost on X like
RT @AGU_Paleo: This elucidates the especially damaging impact of failures in peer review to under-represented groups. NB: intersectionality…
reply repost on X like
RT @AGU_Paleo: This elucidates the especially damaging impact of failures in peer review to under-represented groups. NB: intersectionality…
reply repost on X like
1118 days ago
https://t.co/msmXfH53cD via @thePeerJ I needed to tell one editor that "Reviewer's approach was unnecessarily antagonistic, by using qualifiers to our work as "provocative", "glib", and (not) "serious scientific paper". No response from the editor...(but paper was published)
reply repost on X like
RT @AGU_Paleo: This elucidates the especially damaging impact of failures in peer review to under-represented groups. NB: intersectionality…
reply repost on X like
RT @AGU_Paleo: This elucidates the especially damaging impact of failures in peer review to under-represented groups. NB: intersectionality…
reply repost on X like
RT @AGU_Paleo: This elucidates the especially damaging impact of failures in peer review to under-represented groups. NB: intersectionality…
reply repost on X like
1119 days ago
This elucidates the especially damaging impact of failures in peer review to under-represented groups. NB: intersectionality matters. https://t.co/GpvxdWAGZd
reply repost on X like
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
reply repost on X like
@SolomonKurz I don't know if I have "great walk-outs", but I have used Bayesian stats in a few papers. BRMS: https://t.co/MJOnx5JB1y and https://t.co/6QAjPgBDA6 and using JAGS: https://t.co/YBKwt0Yg8W
reply repost on X like
@NChemGav @JOSE_TheOJ @JOSS_TheOJ You don't know that you are receiving a good/uncritical/ethical when reviewers are anonymous. Anonymity protect abuse, though. And it happens more when you are from a poor country (I have been there) or a woman. Check this: https://t.co/rRa9NRjiFq
reply repost on X like
@DrCraigMc Thanks again! The lack of professionalism is incredible & disproportionately affects URMs (see work by @NSilbiger & @Amber_D_Stubler here: https://t.co/ozOftwylvb).
reply repost on X like
RT @JohannaMappes: These reviewer comments are really disturbing. All of us who work as editors in scientific journals must systematically…
reply repost on X like
RT @JohannaMappes: These reviewer comments are really disturbing. All of us who work as editors in scientific journals must systematically…
reply repost on X like
RT @JohannaMappes: These reviewer comments are really disturbing. All of us who work as editors in scientific journals must systematically…
reply repost on X like
RT @JohannaMappes: These reviewer comments are really disturbing. All of us who work as editors in scientific journals must systematically…
reply repost on X like
RT @JohannaMappes: These reviewer comments are really disturbing. All of us who work as editors in scientific journals must systematically…
reply repost on X like
RT @JohannaMappes: These reviewer comments are really disturbing. All of us who work as editors in scientific journals must systematically…
reply repost on X like
RT @JohannaMappes: These reviewer comments are really disturbing. All of us who work as editors in scientific journals must systematically…
reply repost on X like