A taxonomically and geographically constrained information base limits non-native reptile and amphibian risk assessment: a systematic review

View article
Ecology

Main article text

 

Introduction

Survey Methodology

Results

Representation of herpetofaunal groups in the literature

Subject focus of research

Geographic distribution of work

Success of different herpetofaunal groups

Discussion

Taxonomic biases

Geographic biases

Setting priorities

Supplemental Information

PRISMA checklist.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5850/supp-1

Additional methods and figures.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5850/supp-2

Raw data pertaining to studies included in review.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5850/supp-3

Additional Information and Declarations

Competing Interests

John Measey is an Academic Editor for PeerJ.

Author Contributions

Nicola J. van Wilgen conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analysed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Micaela S. Gillespie performed the experiments, approved the final draft.

David M. Richardson conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

John Measey conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analysed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Availability

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data are provided in the Supplemental Files.

Funding

This work was supported by the DST-NRF Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology and the National Research Foundation of South Africa (grant 85417 to DMR and grant 87759 to JM). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

29 Citations 4,010 Views 711 Downloads