In vitro and in vivo comparison of transport media for detecting nasopharyngeal carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae

View article
PeerJ

Main article text

 

Introduction

Materials and Methods

In vitro comparison

DNA extraction and amplification by qPCR

In vivo comparison

Data analysis

Results

In vitro results

In vivo results

Discussion

Supplemental Information

Raw data in vitro comparison

The dilution, serotype, type of used media for the 3 hour incubation and the results of (I) measured number of colony forming units observed after incubation on blood agar (CFU) and (II) the cycle threshold (Ct) for PCR are presented in the file

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2449/supp-1

Raw data in vivo comparison

The file includes an IDnr for each child and the result on pneumococcal carriage (yes = 1, no = 0) for the swabs that were incubated the first 3 h on enrichment broth (carriageBrothNoReculturing and carriageBroth), and for the swabs that were incubated in STGG (carriageSTGGNoReculturing and carriageSTGG). The variables that include the message ”NoReculturing” present the results on carriage after one night incubation, while the variables lacking that message, present the results on carriage after reculturing and incubation overnight. Reculturing was done for swabs that were tested positive in the agglutination test, but which were initially negative on the blood agar.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2449/supp-2

Methods and results for calibration of the sample cnocentrations

This file shown the method and results of the tests we did before the actual in vitro experiment, to determine the detection limits for pneumococcal detection.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2449/supp-3

Additional Information and Declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare there are no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Anneke Steens and Natacha Milhano conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Ingeborg S. Aaberge conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Didrik F. Vestrheim conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Human Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

Regional Committee for Medical Research Ethics, South-Eastern Norway (REK sør-øst B) Approval number: 2014/2046.

Data Availability

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data has been supplied as a Supplementary File.

Funding

The authors received no funding for this work.

2 Citations 1,869 Views 411 Downloads

Your institution may have Open Access funds available for qualifying authors. See if you qualify

Publish for free

Comment on Articles or Preprints and we'll waive your author fee
Learn more

Five new journals in Chemistry

Free to publish • Peer-reviewed • From PeerJ
Find out more