The Xanthomonas Ax21 protein is processed by the general secretory system and is secreted in association with outer membrane vesicles

View article
PeerJ

Main article text

 

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Bacterial strains and growth conditions

Rice inoculation, lesion measurements and in planta bacterial growth curve analysis

Plasmid construction

Western blot

PXO99 supernatant fractionation and proteinase K treatment

Results and Discussion

Ax21 secretion does not require raxA, raxB, or raxC

Ax21 is processed by the general secretory (Sec) system

Ax21 secretion is associated with outer membrane vesicles

Ax21 is not required for activation of XA21-mediated immunity

Conclusions

Supplemental Information

Ax21 secretion via OMVs is conserved in X. euvesicatoria and Xcc.

Both strains were grown in Ax21-enriching conditions as described for Xoo, and cell-free supernatants were centrifuged at 180,000 g for 2 h to pellet OMVs. Samples were then subjected to Western blot analysis with an anti-Ax21 antibody. Input: cell-free supernatant before centrifugation, ultra supernatant: supernatant after ultracentrifugation, ultra pellet: OMVs pellet after ultracentrifugation that was resuspended in 200 mL of water. Ax21 is absent from supernatants after ultracentrifugation indicating that it is in the insoluble fraction of OMVs.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.242/supp-1

Topology prediction of Ax21.

(A) Predicted membrane topology from BOCTOPUS (Hayat & Elofsson, 2012). Predicted transmembrane β-strands are shown in grey; inner membrane loops are in red; outer membrane loops are in blue. (B) Two-dimensional rendering of the predicted Ax21 topology from PRED-TMBB. For both (A) and (B), the numbering begins from the first amino acid of the processed Ax21.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.242/supp-2

Ax21 is embedded in the outer membrane.

OMVs were purified as described in Materials and Methods and were then treated with Proteinase K and/or 0.1% Triton X-100 for 30 min. While most proteins in the OMVs preparation were degraded by proteinase K, as can be seen in the “Pro K”- treated lanes (CBB straining, left panel), Ax21 remained at the same level as in non-treated samples (Western blot, right panel), indicating that it is embedded in the outer membrane. Some degradation of Ax21 can be observed only when proteinase K treatment was combined with the Triton X-100 detergent.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.242/supp-3

Ax21 secretion is enhanced under enrichment conditions.

PXO99 was grown under regular, or enrichment conditions and tested for Ax21 presence in the cell-free supernatants. Under regular conditions, PXO99 was grown until an OD600 of ∼2.0 in YEB, then the cells were pelleted by centrifugation. The supernatant was filtered using 0.22 mM filter (supernatant). This sample was further concentrated x10 using a 3kDa Centricon. The enrichment sample was prepared as described before and supernatant was concentrated in the same manner as for YEB. Western blot analysis was done using the anti-Ax21 antibody.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.242/supp-4

Validation of the PXO99Δax21 insertion mutant.

The ax21 insertion mutant described in this paper (named here PXO99Δax21-2) and a mislabeled ax21 mutant strain in our collection (named here PXO99Δax21-1) were tested by (A) PCR, (B) Southern blot and (C) Western blot analyses. (A) PCR primers for the full-length ax21 ORF were used (forward primer- CGCCATATGAAGACTTCTTTGCTGGCCCT; reverse primer- CGCGGATCCTTACCAGCTGAAGCGCGG; (in bold are sequences for restriction enzymes used for cloning). PCR of the ax21 gene is expected to yield a ∼0.6 kb product from PXO99, and a ∼1.8 kb from the ax21 insertion mutant (includes ∼1.2 kb insertion of the kanamycin resistance gene). (B) Southern blot analysis was carried on out on MscI-digest genomic DNA probed with a labeled 1.2 kb kanamycin resistance gene. The predicted size for a correct ax21 insertion mutant is 4227 bp. (C) Western blot analysis on total cells using the anti-Ax21 antibody as described in Material and Methods section. For each assay the wild type PXO99 strain, the PXO99Δax21-2 insertion mutant strain showing the correct DNA profile and the mislabeled PXO99Δax21-1 strain showing an incorrect DNA profile are shown.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.242/supp-5

In planta bacterial growth curve analysis shows that the PXO99Δax21 validated insertion mutant is not virulent on TP309-XA21.

Bacterial growth in planta was assessed as described in the Materials and Methods section. When inoculated on the TP309-XA21 rice line (right panel), PXO99Δax21 does not grow to higher levels than PXO99, while the control, XA21-virulent strain PXO99ΔraxST, grows to significantly higher numbers than both PXO99 and PXO99Δax21 at 8 and 12 days after inoculation (dai). On TP309 (right panel) the PXO99ΔraxST shows lower cell titer only at the 12 dai point. Each time point represents an average of 6 leaves ± SE. Statistical analysis was done for each time point using the Tukey-Kramer HSD test. Asterisk represents significant difference at p < 0.05.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.242/supp-6

Additional Information and Declarations

Competing Interests

Pamela Ronald is an Academic Editor for PeerJ.

Author Contributions

Ofir Bahar, Rory Pruitt and Pamela Ronald conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper.

Benjamin Schwessinger, Ralf Koebnik and Lisa Fontaine-Bodin commented on the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by a US-Israel Binational Science Foundation (BSF) grant 2011062. The work of OB was supported by a Binational Agricultural Research and Development Fund (BARD) post doctoral fellowship FI-433-10. The work of BS was supported by a Human Frontier Science Program long term post doctoral fellowship. This research was also supported by the Agropolis Foundation grant #1200-003, grant #NIH GM55962, and the 2012-2103 Fulbright-Tocqueville Distinguished Chair Award to P.C.R. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

46 Citations 7,525 Views 1,213 Downloads