Prevalence and risk factors of sarcopenia and effect of sarcopenia on functional status and falls incidents among the elderly in Selangor

View article
Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation

Introduction

Sarcopenia is a chronic disease characterized by the loss of muscle mass, muscle strength and function in the elderly (Tarantino et al., 2023; Xie et al., 2021). The term sarcopenia was introduced by Rosenberg, who discussed the concept of age related decrease in muscle mass (Rosenberg, 1989; Rosenberg, 1997). Subsequently, European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) was developed in 2010 and followed by Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS) in 2014 (Cruz-Jentoft, 2010; Chen et al., 2014). The aforementioned guidelines were then updated in 2019 (Cruz-Jentoft et al., 2019; Chen et al., 2020). In order to develop a universally accepted and standardized definition of sarcopenia, Global Leadership Initiative in Sarcopenia (GLIS) was initiated and a steering committee was formed in 2019–2021. Agreement were reached through Delphi study on general aspect, components and outcome of sarcopenia (Kirk et al., 2024). The aforementioned refined guideline provided a clearer diagnostic algorithm for the researchers, intensifying studies on sarcopenia globally.

The pathophysiology of sarcopenia is related to factors such as imbalance between the catabolic and anabolic pathway of muscle protein, reduction in satellite cells and neuromuscular junction dysfunction (Jang, Kim & Kim, 2023; Patel et al., 2015; Moreira-Pais et al., 2022). There are various complications associated with sarcopenia which are concerning. Studies have shown that, elderly people suffering from sarcopenia are associated with higher mortality, falls, fracture, hospitalization rates and functional status dependence compared to those without sarcopenia (Beaudart et al., 2016; Hunter et al., 2019; Yeung et al., 2019; Wearing et al., 2020).

The prevalence of sarcopenia globally is around 10.0% to 16.0% based on a study in Sweden (Yuan & Larsson, 2023). However, the prevalence of sarcopenia at the Asian region differs, ranging from 5.5% to 25.7%, with the incidence of sarcopenia being more prevalent in men (5.1–21.0%) than in women (4.1–16.3%) (Chen et al., 2020). Meanwhile in Malaysia, the prevalence of sarcopenia ranges between 3.6% to 28.5% (Ramoo et al., 2022; Sazlina et al., 2020).

According to the latest guidelines of AWGS 2019, updates were done on the definition of low muscle strength and low physical performance. Besides that the term possible sarcopenia were introduced with the purpose of early intervention (Chen et al., 2020). At present, studies with the updated guideline are limited in Malaysia (Ranee et al., 2022; Mohamad Zani et al., 2025). In addition, the AWGS 2019 also recommends using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) with multiple frequency instead of single frequency, as it may compromise the diagnosis. Besides that, most of the studies pertaining to sarcopenia in Malaysia still uses BIA with single frequency, hence this study was justified as it used BIA with multiple frequency (Ramoo et al., 2022; Mohamad Zani et al., 2025).

Clinical practice guidelines specifically for sarcopenia are unavailable at the moment in Malaysia. Clinical practice guidelines are important as it helps doctors to improve the outcome of patient health care (Guerra-Farfan et al., 2023). Hence this study output could be used as one the key data when creating the clinical practice guidelines in Malaysia, especially in terms of disease burden and risk factors of sarcopenia.

In addition, previous sarcopenia studies in Malaysia were more focused on the elderly population suffering from specific diseases such as diabetes mellitus and cognitive impairment (Ramoo et al., 2022; Sazlina et al., 2020). However, comprehensive research at the community level on sarcopenia disease burden, risk factors and the effects are limited. Hence, we conducted this research at the community level to investigate the prevalence, risk factors and the effect of sarcopenia on functional status and falls among elderly in Selangor state, Malaysia.

Materials and Methods

Design and the study population

This is a cross-sectional study which was conducted among elderly aged 60 years and above in two districts in Selangor. The state of Selangor was chosen as the study location because it is one of the state with a high elderly population in Malaysia (DOSM, 2024a). In addition, Selangor state is the highest populated state in Malaysia making up 21.6 percent of the nation’s population and comprises of all major races such as Malay, Chinese and Indian (DOSM, 2024b). As we aimed to investigate the disease burden and effects of sarcopenia, a diverse elderly population is essential to ensure generalizable study outcome. Kuala Langat district with an estimated population of 0.28 million and Petaling district with an estimated population of 2.2 million was chosen to represent the rural and urban region respectively (DOSM, 2021). Sampling frame of this study was derived from the Community Development Unit under the district office. Subsequently, the list of elderly people from the areas selected was obtained after engagement with the village or community head. Multistage cluster sampling was performed with Kuala Langat and Petaling district as the primary sampling units. Three sub-districts from each district was chosen as the secondary sampling unit. Finally, a town or village were randomly chosen from each sub-district as the third sampling point. Random sampling was done for households with elderly above 60 years old. Whenever more than one adult is present in the chosen household, Kish grid table was used to pick the sample. This method helps to eliminate any potential bias by the researcher from selecting respondents themselves, and ensuring each member of the household who meets the eligibility has an equal chance of being chosen (Nemeth, 2002). The inclusion criteria for this study is being 60-years old and above, able to understand, read and speak Bahasa Malaysia or English language and voluntarily consents to participates in the study.

The sample size of this study was determined using the Kish formula, together with design effect of 1.2. With the consideration of 20% of non response rate, the sample for this study was 451. We were able to recruit 494 respondents and after excluding 25 respondents who did not fulfil the inclusion criteria, 469 respondents were accepted to participate in the study voluntarily without any conflict of interest. The age range of the respondents who participated in this study were from 60 years old to 88 years old of age.

Prior to the interview, respondents were briefed regarding the study and given the information sheet and consent form. Subsequently, written informed consent from the participants was obtained and the interview was conducted face to face by the researchers and used either Bahasa Malaysia or English language. Each interview session lasted about 30–40 min. In this study, apart from the interview session, anthropometry and body composition measurements were performed on the respondents.

This study received approval from the Research Ethics Committee of University Kebangsaan Malaysia, under the approval code FF-2022-363. This research was conducted according to the the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Study variables

The respondents of this study answered the questionnaires regarding sociodemographic, socioeconomic status, lifestyle and presence of comorbidities. Physical activity level was determined using the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) (WHO, 2002). Depression were determined using the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) (Yesavage et al., 1982). Barthel Index of Activities of Daily Living and Lawton-Brody Instrumental Activities of Daily Living questionnaires were used to access functional status (Mahoney & Barthel, 1965; Lawton & Brody, 1969). Falls incidents were determined using the 12-months falls recall questionnaire (NIH, 2018a). Questionnaires for the functional status and falls incidents were translated to Bahasa Malaysia and used in National Health and Morbidity Survey (NHMS) 2018 elderly health survey (NIH, 2018a). Prior to the study, necessary permission to use the translated and validated questionnaires into Bahasa Malaysia were obtained. Cultural adaptation on the questionnaires were not performed in this study due to cost and time constraints.

Diagnosis of sarcopenia

In this study, possible sarcopenia, confirmed sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia were determined using the AWGS 2019 criteria (Chen et al., 2020). Possible sarcopenia is determined by low muscle strength or reduced physical performance. Low muscle mass and poor muscle strength or physical performance indicates confirmed sarcopenia. Presence of low muscle mass, muscle strength together with reduced physical performance indicates diagnosis of severe sarcopenia. Using BIA, the cut-offs for muscle mass measurement are <7.0 kg/m2 for men and <5.7 kg/m2 for women. Low muscle strength is defined as handgrip strength <28 kg for men and <18 kg for women. Low physical performance is indicated with 5-time chair stand test that took 12 s or more to be completed.

Height of the respondents were measured in meter using the Inbody PUSH, a portable ultrasonic digital stadiometer (Inbody, 2016). Before the measurement was taken, the procedure was explained and the respondent was asked not to move during the measurement. Next, the researcher ensured that the respondent had removed their shoes or slippers and was asked to stand on the floor with even surface. The end of the portable stadiometer were placed on the head of the respondent and the measurement was taken once and recorded. If the respondent moved during the measurement, the process of measurement was repeated again.

Appendicular skeletal mass of the respondents were accessed using the portable multifrequency bioimpedance analysis device (InBody 270; Seoul, Korea). Muscle strength was determined using the hand grip dynamometer (T.K.K. 5001 GRIP-A; Takei Scientific Instrument Co. Ltd., Japan). The hand grip strength of each respondents was measured three times in standing position by alternating both hands and the highest average value were chosen. Physical performance were performed using the 5-time chair stand test and the time taken were recorded using stopwatch. Respondents that took 12 s or more were classified as low physical performance (Chen et al., 2020).

Data analysis

Complete data were obtained and analysed using IBM SPSS version 21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) with the significance level of p < 0.05 (two-tailed). Descriptive data with categorical variables were analysed using frequency and percentage. In order to address the effect of confounders, multivariate analysis was used. Multinomial logistic regression that comprises of univariate and multivariate analysis was used to examine the relationship between sociodemographic factors, socioeconomic factors, lifestyle, and comorbidities with sarcopenia. The statistical test requirements were met and all variables were checked for interaction. No significant interaction was found between the variables. In addition, multi-collinearity between variables was tested and the variance inflation factor (VIF) value was less than ten and the standard error value was less than five. Based on the Model Fitting Information, the Chi-Square test produced a value of (p < 0.05), which indicated that there was a significant relationship between the dependent and independent variables in the final model. The goodness of fit test with Pearson and Deviance statistical values (p > 0.05) showed that the model had a good fit with the data. The pseudo-R-Square values including Cox and Snell, Nagelkerke and McFadden showed that the variation explained by the model ranged from 12.6% to 30.2%

Binary logistic regression analysis which includes simple and multiple binary logistic were used to assess the effect of sarcopenia on functional status dependence and falls incidents among the elderly. Both backward and forward likelihood ratio (LR) tests produced similar and consistent results. Besides that, none of the variables had significant interactions. Multi-collinearity were determined with the value of VIF less than ten and the standard error value was less than five. The model used was fit as evidenced by the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test which showed non-significant results. Besides that, adjustment for covariates were also performed in assessing the effect of sarcopenia on functional status dependence and falls incidents. In addition, bivariate analysis were used to analyse falls characteristics based on the sarcopenia classification.

Results

Out of a total of 469 respondents, 226 (48.2%) were male respondents, whereas 243 (51.8%) were female respondents. A total of 354 (75.5%) respondents in this study were in the age category of 60 to 74 years. Besides that, majority of respondents were Malays (38.0%), followed by Indian respondents (34.1%) and Chinese respondents (27.9%). In this study, 52.0% of the respondents have primary education level or less and 88.3% of the respondents were married.

The prevalence of possible sarcopenia, confirmed sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia was 38.4%, 10.0% and 24.5%, respectively. The prevalence of activities of daily living (ADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) dependency was 26.0% and 25.4% respectively and 42.2% of the respondents reported falls in the past 12 months. Other descriptive statistics were shown in Table 1. Meanwhile, risk factors associated with sarcopenia were shown in Table 2.

Table 1:
Characteristics of the study population.
Variables (n) (%)
Age (years) 60–74 354 75.5
≥75 115 25.5
Gender Male 226 48.2
Female 243 51.8
Race Malay 178 38.0
Chinese 131 27.9
Indian 160 34.1
Education level Primary or less 244 52.0
Secondary 184 39.2
Tertiary 41 8.7
Marital status Single 15 3.2
Married 414 88.3
Widowed or divorced 40 8.5
Locality Petaling 234 49.9
Kuala Langat 235 50.1
Occupation Not employed 94 20.0
Housewife 212 45.2
Retired 70 14.9
Working 93 19.8
Household income B-40 452 96.4
M-40 11 2.3
T-20 6 1.3
Smoking status Active smoker 50 10.7
Ex-smoker 37 7.9
Never smoked 382 81.4
Alcohol consumption status Alcohol drinker 98 20.9
Ex-drinker 9 1.9
Never drinked 362 77.2
Physical activity Active 109 23.2
Inactive 360 76.8
Type-2 diabetes mellitus Yes 160 34.1
No 309 65.9
Hypertension Yes 298 63.5
No 171 36.5
Dyslipidemia Yes 294 62.7
No 175 37.3
Cardiovascular disease Yes 50 10.7
No 419 89.3
Osteoporosis Yes 29 6.2
No 440 93.8
Depresssion Yes 38 8.1
No 431 91.9
Sarcopenia No sarcopenia 127 27.1
Classification Possible sarcopenia 180 38.4
Confirmed sarcopenia 47 10.0
Severe sarcopenia 115 24.5
ADL Dependency 122 26.0
No dependency 347 74.0
IADL Dependency 119 25.4
No dependency 350 74.6
Falls incidents Yes 198 42.2
No 271 57.8
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.20175/table-1
Table 2:
Multinomial multivariate logistic regression analysis for risk factors of sarcopenia.
Variables Possible sarcopenia Confirmed sarcopenia Severe sarcopenia
β SE aOR (95% CI) β SE aOR (95% CI) Β SE aOR (95% CI)
Age (years)
60–74 1.00
≥75 0.533 0.332 1.71 [0.89–3.27] 0.663 0.470 1.94 [0.77–4.87] 1.509 0.353 4.52 [2.26–9.03]***
Gender
Male 1.00
Female 0.948 0.267 2.58 [1.53–4.36]*** 1.112 0.392 3.04 [1.41–6.55]** 0.610 0.304 1.84 [1.01–3.34]*
Race
Malay 0.499 0.319 1.65 [0.88–3.08] −0.207 0.447 0.81 [0.34–1.95] 0.327 0.381 1.39 [0.66–2.93]
Indian 0.509 0.362 1.66 [0.82–3.38] 0.400 0.493 1.49 [0.57–3.92] 1.339 0.401 3.82 [1.74–8.39]**
Chinese 1.00
Locality
Petaling 1.066 0.260 2.90 [1.75–4.83]*** 0.014 0.395 1.01 [0.47–2.20] 1.339 0.304 3.82 [2.10–6.93]***
Kuala Langat 1.00
Level of education
Primary or less 0.368 0.440 1.45 [0.61–3.42] 1.006 0.850 2.73 [0.52–14.47] 1.671 0.649 5.32 [1.49–18.97]*
Secondary −0.157 0.427 0.85 [0.37–1.98] 0.850 0.832 2.34 [0.46–11.96] 0.572 0.645 1.77 [0.50–6.28]
Tertiary 1.00
Physical activity
Active 1.00
Inactive 0.403 0.300 1.50 [0.83–2.69] −0.149 0.402 0.86 [0.39–1.89] 0.825 0. 377 2.28 [1.09–4.78]*
Comorbidities
Type-2 diabetes mellitus
Yes 0.627 0.290 1.87 [1.06–3.31]* −0.291 0.486 0.75 [0.29–1.94] 0.545 0.335 1.73 [0.89–3.33]
No 1.00
Hypertension
Yes 0.199 0.281 1.22 [0.70–2.12] −0.811 0.393 0.45 [0.21–0.96]* −0.592 0.321 0.55 [0.30–1.04]
No 1.00
Depression
Yes −0.594 0.543 0.55 [0.19–1.60] 1.183 0.600 3.27 [1.01–10.59]* −0.103 0.552 0.90 [0.31–2.66]
No 1.00
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.20175/table-2

Notes:

1.00 = reference category, SE = standard error, β = Beta, Nagelkerke pseudo-R2 = 0.30.

p < 0.05.
p < 0.01.
p < 0.001.

Possible sarcopenia

Risk factors

Female respondents had 2.6 times higher odds (adjusted odds ratio 2.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.53–4.36], p < 0.001) of having possible sarcopenia than no sarcopenia compared to male respondents. Based on the locality, respondents who live in the Petaling district have 2.9 times higher odds (adjusted odds ratio 2.90, 95% CI [1.75–4.83], p < 0.001) to have possible sarcopenia than no sarcopenia compared to respondents who live in the Kuala Langat district. In addition, respondents with type-2 diabetes mellitus had 1.9 times higher odds (adjusted odds ratio 1.87, 95% CI [1.06–3.31], p = 0.031) to have possible sarcopenia than no sarcopenia compared to respondents who do not have type-2 diabetes mellitus.

Confirmed sarcopenia

Risk factors

Female respondents had 3 times higher odds (adjusted odds ratio 3.04, 95% CI [1.41–6.55], p = 0.005) of having confirmed sarcopenia than no sarcopenia compared to male respondents. Respondents with depression had 3.3 times higher odds (adjusted odds ratio 3.27, 95% CI [1.01–10.59], p = 0.048) of having confirmed sarcopenia than no sarcopenia compared to respondents without depression. Respondents with hypertension had 0.45 times lower odds (adjusted odds ratio 0.45, 95% CI [0.21–0.96], p = 0.039) of having confirmed sarcopenia than no sarcopenia compared to respondents without hypertension.

Severe sarcopenia

Risk factors

Respondents in the age category 75 years and above had 4.5 times higher odds (adjusted odds ratio 4.52, 95% CI [2.26–9.03], p < 0.001) of having severe sarcopenia than no sarcopenia compared to respondents in the age category 60 to 74 years. Female respondents had 1.8 times higher odds (adjusted odds ratio 1.84, 95% CI [1.01–3.34], p = 0.045) of having severe sarcopenia than no sarcopenia compared to male respondents. Respondents living in Petaling district had 3.8 times higher odds (adjusted odds ratio 3.82, 95% CI [2.10–6.93], p < 0.001) of having severe sarcopenia than no sarcopenia compared to respondents living in Kuala Langat district.

In this study it was found that Indian respondents had 3.8 times higher odds (adjusted odds ratio 3.82, 95% CI [1.74–8.39], p < 0.001) of having severe sarcopenia than no sarcopenia compared to Chinese respondents. Based on the level of education, respondents with primary education or less were found to have 5.3 times more odds higher (adjusted odds ratio 5.32, 95% CI [1.49–18.97], p = 0.010) to have severe sarcopenia than no sarcopenia compared to respondents with tertiary education. Additionally, physically inactive respondents had 2.3 times higher odds (adjusted odds ratio 2.28, 95% CI [1.09–4.78], p = 0.029) of having severe sarcopenia than no sarcopenia compared to physically active respondents.

Effect of sarcopenia on ADL dependency

Effect of sarcopenia on ADL dependency were shown in Table 3. After adjusting for age and osteoporosis, respondents with confirmed sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia had 10.5 times higher odds (adjusted odds ratio 10.54, 95% CI [4.86–22.85], p < 0.001) to have ADL dependency compared to respondents without sarcopenia.

Table 3:
Multiple binary logistic regression analysis on effect of sarcopenia on ADL dependency.
Variables β SE OR (95% CI) β SE aOR (95% CI)
Sarcopenia classification
No sarcopenia 1.00 1.00
Possible sarcopenia 0.664 0.377 1.94 [0.93–4.06] 0.558 0.412 1.75 [0.78–3.92]
Confirmed sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia 2.405 0.352 11.08 [5.56–22.10]*** 2.355 0.395 10.54 [4.86–22.85]***
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.20175/table-3

Notes:

Adjusted for age and osteoporosis.

p-value < 0.001.

Effect of sarcopenia on IADL dependency

Effect of sarcopenia on IADL dependency were shown in Table 4. After adjusting for age, occupation, high blood pressure, osteoporosis and depression, it was found that respondents with confirmed sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia had 8.5 times higher odds (adjusted odds ratio 8.55, 95% CI [3.76–19.44], p < 0.001) to have IADL dependency compared to respondents without sarcopenia.

Table 4:
Multiple binary logistic regression analysis on effect of sarcopenia on IADL dependency.
Variables β SE OR (95% CI) β SE aOR (95% CI)
Sarcopenia classification
No sarcopenia 1.00
Possible sarcopenia 1.116 0.395 3.05 [1.41–6.62]** 0.789 0.435 2.20 [0.94–5.17]
Confirmed sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia 2.450 0.380 11.59 [5.50–24.40]*** 2.146 0.419 8.55 [3.76–19.44]***
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.20175/table-4

Notes:

Adjusted for age, occupation, Hypertension, osteoporosis and depression.

p-value < 0.01.
p-value < 0.001.

Effect of sarcopenia on falls incidents

Effect of sarcopenia on falls incidents were shown in Table 5. After adjusting for locality, physical activity and osteoporosis, respondents with the possible sarcopenia had 3.3 times higher odds (adjusted odds ratio 3.34, 95% CI [1.83–6.10], p < 0.001) to experience falls incidents compared to respondents with no sarcopenia. In addition, respondents with confirmed sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia had 10.6 times higher odds (adjusted odds ratio 10.62, 95% CI [5.77–19.52], p < 0.001) of experiencing a falls incidents compared to respondents with no sarcopenia.

Table 5:
Multiple binary logistic regression analysis on effect of sarcopenia on falls incidents.
Variables β SE OR (95% CI) β SE aOR (95% CI)
Sarcopenia classification
No sarcopenia 1.00
Possible sarcopenia 1.396 0.296 4.04 [2.26–7.22]*** 1.207 0.306 3.34 [1.83–6.10]***
Confirmed sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia 2.494 0.304 12.11 [6.67–21.98]*** 2.362 0.311 10.62 [5.77–19.52]***
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.20175/table-5

Notes:

Adjusted for locality, physical activity and osteoporosis.

p-value < 0.001.

Falls characteristics based on sarcopenia classification

Falls characteristics based on sarcopenia classification were shown in Table 6. Out of the total 198 falls incidents, 90.9% of the falls occurred for respondents with possible sarcopenia, confirmed sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia compared to only 9.1% falls incidents that occurred for respondents with no sarcopenia.

Table 6:
Bivariate analysis on characteristics of falls based on sarcopenia classification.
Falls characteristics Total (n) No sarcopenia n (%) Possible sarcopenia n (%) Confirmed sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia n (%) χ
Falls incidents
Yes 198 18 (9.1) 72 (36.4) 108 (54.5) 81.01***
No 271 109 (40.2) 108 (39.9) 54 (19.9)
Frequency of falls
1 156 14 (9.0) 53 (34.0) 89 (57.0) 2.01
≥2 42 4 (9.5) 19 (45.2) 19 (45.2)
Type of injuries
Minor injury 179 13 (7.3) 63 (35.2) 103 (57.5) 10.63**
Severe injury 19 5 (26.3) 9 (47.4) 5 (26.3)
Treatment
Self treated 119 8 (6.7) 45 (37.8) 66 (55.5) 88.82***
Outpatient 61 5 (8.2) 19 (31.1) 37 (60.7)
Admitted to hospital 18 5 (27.8) 8 (44.4) 5 (27.8)
Location of falls
Inside the house 104 6 (5.7) 37 (35.6) 61 (58.7) 100.95***
Bathroom/toilet 35 2 (5.7) 7 (20.0) 26 (74.3)
House yard 39 7 (17.9) 21 (53.8) 11 (28.2)
Outside of the house 20 3 (15.0) 7 (35.0) 10 (50.0)
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.20175/table-6

Notes:

χ = Chi square.

p-value < 0.01.
p-value < 0.001.

According to the falls frequency, 42 participants in this research reported experiencing at least two falls, and 90.4% of them were classified as having possible sarcopenia, confirmed sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia, while only 9.5% of the respondents were with no sarcopenia.

We reported, 179 respondents had minor injuries and 92.7% of them occurred in respondents with possible sarcopenia, confirmed sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia compared to only 7.3% of respondents with no sarcopenia. Out of the total 19 incidents of severe injuries, 73.7% of them were suffered by respondents with possible sarcopenia, confirmed sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia compared to only 26.3% respondents with no sarcopenia. Out of the total 18 respondents who were admitted to the ward for falls related injuries, 72.2% of them were from possible sarcopenia, confirmed sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia, compared to only 27.8% of respondents with no sarcopenia.

According to the falls location, 104 falls incidents happened inside the house, and 94.3% of the respondents were having possible sarcopenia, confirmed sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia compared to only 5.7% of respondents with no sarcopenia. In total, 20 falls incidents occurred outside the house, and 85.0% of the respondents were having possible sarcopenia, confirmed sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia compared to only 15.0% of respondents with no sarcopenia.

Discussion

Prevalence of sarcopenia, functional status dependency and falls

We reported higher prevalence of possible sarcopenia, confirmed sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia compared to previous studies in Malaysia (Sazlina et al., 2020; Iskandar et al., 2021). However, this differences were not observed upon comparison with Southeast Asian and European countries, which reported higher prevalence on either possible sarcopenia, confirmed sarcopenia or severe sarcopenia (Pang et al., 2021; Murph et al., 2023; Vanitcharoenkul et al., 2024). The aforementioned variations in the prevalence, could be due to the differences in the diagnostic criteria used in the Asian and European regions (Petermann-Rocha et al., 2021). Besides that, tools used for the measurement of the appendicular skeletal mass influenced the reported prevalence. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) has a better sensitivity and specificity compared to BIA (Cheng et al., 2021). Nonetheless, BIA was chosen as it was portable, lightweight, easily assembled and not time consuming (Kandayah et al., 2023). Moreover, studies have shown BIA as a suitable alternative to DXA and functions as an effective tool in diagnosing sarcopenia (Sousa-Santos et al., 2021; van den Helder et al., 2022).

Alarming high prevalence of ADL and IADL dependence, together with falls incidents in our study are consistent with the national elderly health survey findings in Malaysia (NIH, 2018b). This could be attributed to the fact that, majority of the respondents were from low income group, having primary education or less and are physically inactive. Studies globally have indicated that, these factors as significant predictors for functional status dependence and falls (Maruszewska, Ambroży & Rydzik, 2025; Hyejin et al., 2021; Nguyen et al., 2022).

Risk factors of sarcopenia

Respondents in the age category of 75 years and above are one of the risk factors for severe sarcopenia. A similar finding was found in a study conducted in Thailand involving 330 respondents, which showed age as one of the risk factors for sarcopenia (Therakomen, Petchlorlian & Lakananurak, 2020). Loss of muscle mass accelerates significantly, especially after the age of 60 (Holloszy, 2000; Melton et al., 2000; Volpi, Nazemi & Fujita, 2004). Besides that, with increasing age, lower proportion of elderly participates in physical activity due to health conditions that restricts their mobility, fear of falling and depression (Meredith et al., 2023; Zhang & Jiang, 2023). In line with the concept of ‘use it or lose it’ in muscle metabolism, lack of physical activity, causes loss of muscle mass and strength which in turn increases the tendency for the elderly to suffer sarcopenia (Grgic, 2022).

We found that female gender as a risk factor for possible sarcopenia, confirmed sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia. According to a cohort study in United Kingdom, female gender had 20.0% higher risk of developing sarcopenia compared to male gender (Yang, Smith & Hamer, 2019). This could be due to the hormonal changes which causes skeletal muscle loss to occur more quickly in women than in men, especially from the age of 65 years to 74 years (Kodete et al., 2024; Burger et al., 2002). In contrast, a study in Brazil showed that elderly men had a higher risk of sarcopenia compared to the elderly women (Pelegrini et al., 2018). This could be due to the rapid reduction in testosterone and insulin-like growth factor-1 levels in elderly men which leads to loss of muscle mass and strength (Du et al., 2019).

Indian race is identified as a risk factor for severe sarcopenia. According to a study in done in India, Indian individuals were found to have high intramyocellular fat content in the skeletal muscle cells (Sucharita et al., 2019). High intramyocellular fat content were found to be detrimental to skeletal muscle density which subsequently increases the likelihood of developing sarcopenia (Rolland, 2008). Nonetheless, we cannot conclude based on this particular study alone that other races are at lower risk of developing sarcopenia as there are various factors apart from race, that influences the occurrence of sarcopenia (Cheng et al., 2021).

Based on the result, Petaling district which represents the urban area were identified as a risk factor for developing possible sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia which concurred with the result from a previous study in Unites States (Aziz et al., 2020). Although various recreational facilities are available in urban areas, these facilities are generally located far from the residential areas, making it difficult for the elderly to travel and exercise (Yu et al., 2019). Besides that, the food environment in urban area are saturated with unhealthy food options due to the increased availability and accessibility to fast food outlets (Kandayah, Safian & Shah, 2023). Subsequently, the likelihood of the elderly adopting unhealthy eating habits increases, which are proven to be harmful to overall muscle health (Zhang et al., 2020; van Erpecum et al., 2022).

Elderly having primary education or less were identified as a risk factor for severe sarcopenia. According to a study in Ireland which involved 3,342 respondents, elderly with low level of education often face socioeconomic disadvantages, making them more susceptible to sarcopenia compared to those with higher educational attainment (Swan, Warters & O’Sullivan, 2021). Low level of education often translates to poor health literacy which becomes a barrier to understand the importance of proper nutrition and exercise, particularly muscle resistance exercise which are essential to prevent sarcopenia (Fan et al., 2024).

In terms of physical activity, being physically inactive increases the risk for severe sarcopenia. Previous research finding have shown that being physically active helps to increase the muscle mass and strength and reduces the possibility of developing sarcopenia (Mijnarends et al., 2016). Another separate study done in China showed that, apart from increasing grip strength and muscle mass, exercise also improves physical performance of the elderly (Wang, Huang & Zhao, 2022). This underscores the importance of elderly being physical active which helps to reduce the risk of developing sarcopenia.

Respondents with type-2 diabetes mellitus are at risk of developing confirmed sarcopenia which are in line with a study conducted in primary care clinics in Malaysia (Sazlina et al., 2020). High intramyocellular fat in the skeletal muscle cell is linked to insulin resistance which is postulated to induce the muscle attenuation (Ahmed Al Saedi, Debruin & Hayes, 2022; Liu & Zhu, 2023). Besides that, various studies have indicated that diabetes mellitus could induce mitochondrial dysfunction which is proven as one of the key factor in the development of sarcopenia (Ferri et al., 2020; Chen et al., 2023).

Results showed that elderly with depression are susceptible for confirmed sarcopenia. Based on studies done in Taiwan and Turkey, elderly suffering from depression were found to be detached from social activities, resulting in physical inactivity and at a higher risk for poor dietary intake (Lin et al., 2024; Delibaş et al., 2021). Besides that, depression could be triggered by the sudden death of a spouse and increases the risk of institutionalization, particularly those with poor family support (Lu et al., 2023; Nihtilä & Martikainen, 2008). The aforementioned spillover effects, subsequently increases the tendency of the elderly developing sarcopenia.

Interestingly, we found that hypertension as a protective factor against confirmed sarcopenia which is not in line with various studies (Bai et al., 2020; Quan et al., 2023). However, there are several possible mechanism of how high blood pressure may serve as a protective factor for sarcopenia. A study done in Netherlands showed that elderly with high systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressure (MAP), had a higher hand grip strength (Taekema et al., 2011). A separate study in Japan indicated that elderly with hypertension, together with a high CD 34-positive cell content to have a higher hand grip strength (Shimizu et al., 2021). High blood pressure causes injury to the endothelium resulting in platelet activation, which in turn causes an increase in CD 34-positive cells. The high content of CD 34-positive cells is postulated to play a role in stimulating angiogenesis and activating muscle satellite cells (Radu et al., 2023). However, it is important to take note that, further research with a bigger sample size is required to draw a conclusion as complex interaction between the diseases may lead to unexpected protective association of hypertension on sarcopenia.

Effect of sarcopenia on functional status dependence

Confirmed sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia were identified as risk factors for ADL dependence. These findings align with a cohort study in Korea which reported 22.2% of respondents with sarcopenia had ADL dependence compared to only 10.9% of respondents without sarcopenia (Jang et al., 2018). Another study in Latin America and the Caribbean region indicated that decline in the gait speed as a mediating factor between sarcopenia and functional status dependence (Perez-Sousa et al., 2019).

Respondents with confirmed sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia were identified as risk factors for IADL dependence which is consistent with other previous study (Jang et al., 2018). Another separate study in Korea showed that, respondents with walking speed of less than 0.6 m/s were associated with IADL dependency (Hong et al., 2016). This could explain the findings in the current study, as gait speed which is a component of physical performance is impacted in possible sarcopenia, confirmed sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia (Chen et al., 2020).

Falls characteristics and effect of sarcopenia

We have reported that most of the falls incidents occurred among individuals with possible sarcopenia, confirmed sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia. This further reinforces previous research findings that identified sarcopenia as a risk factor for falls, as muscle strength and muscle mass are crucial for maintaining a steady gait while walking (Yeung et al., 2019; Iskandar et al., 2021; Dhillon & Hasni, 2017). In terms of frequency of falls, most of the respondents who had any or recurrent falls, were those with possible sarcopenia, confirmed sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia. Studies have shown that sarcopenia affects the gait speed, endurance and balance which increases the tendency of recurrent falling (Iijima & Aoyama, 2021; Landi et al., 2012).

Majority of minor and severe injuries resulting from falls were experienced by respondents with possible sarcopenia, confirmed sarcopenia, or severe sarcopenia. A study in Korea showed that, elderly with sarcopenia had 1.6 times higher odds to suffer from falls-related injuries compared to those without sarcopenia (Woo & Kim, 2014). Slow gait speed which is observed in individuals with sarcopenia, causes severe injuries such as fractures during a fall event (Harris et al., 2022). Previous studies have indicated that, slow gait speed is associated with reduced bone mineral density in elderly (Kwon et al., 2007; Hirase et al., 2023). Besides that, elderly with slow gait speed have longer reaction time which directly impacts the severity of the injury sustained as the individual ability to react and adapt to the loss of balance during a fall event is compromised (Liu et al., 2024). Hence it was not surprising, as the majority of admission to the ward due to severe injuries in this study are among those elderly with possible sarcopenia, confirmed sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia.

Results shows that, most of the falls occurred inside the house compared to outside the house and majority of the respondents are those suffering from sarcopenia, irrespective of the classification. A cross-sectional study in Brazil showed that, extrinsic factors such as stairs, loose carpets, high toilet position and slippery floor inside the house may contribute as a hazard during a fall event (Rossetin et al., 2016). Apart from the extrinsic factors, the elderly may also suffer from vision impairment, which further escalates the risk of fall inside the house (Metanmo et al., 2022; Li et al., 2023). In addition, sarcopenia is also identified as a prominent risk factor for postural instability that increases the likelihood of falling (Kim et al., 2020). Based on a study in Japan, sarcopenia causes detrimental effects on the lower limb proprioception, which directly impacts the postural stability and subsequently increasing the risk of fall (Sakai et al., 2022).

Limitation

This is a cross sectional study, hence we are unable to determine causal relationship. A larger sample size is required to further reduce the impact of confounding factors and gender representation. Besides that, this study used instruments such as the stop watch, hand grip dynamometer and BIA that increases the tendency of measurement bias. In order to address the issue, the instruments were calibrated accordingly. The researcher underwent training and certification with the Malaysian Society of Body Composition (MSBC) prior to the data collection. Apart from that, elderly at the care centre were not included which has limited the external validity of this study. The aforementioned limitations were inevitable due to hindrance in terms of time and resources.

Conclusion

This study reveals concerning findings regarding the high prevalence of sarcopenia and its detrimental health effects on functional status dependence and falls incidence. Besides that, majority of the risk factors were modifiable in nature. Hence, it is important to initiate sarcopenia screening at the community level to identify the elderly at risk. Early identification will help the healthcare providers to prescribe interventions such as the muscle resistance exercise and nutritional interventions which are essential to mitigate the complications associated with sarcopenia.

Supplemental Information

STROBE Checklist.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.20175/supp-3