Adjuvant Pam3CSk4 does not improve the immunization against Cryptococcus gattii infection in C57BL/6 mice

View article
de Campos et al. @usponline find adjuvant Pam3CSk4 does not improve the immunization against Cryptococcus gattii infection in C57BL/6 mice Read the full article https://t.co/q3Zs68SQ2j #CellBiology #Mycology
de Campos et al. @usponline find adjuvant Pam3CSk4 does not improve the immunization against Cryptococcus gattii infection in C57BL/6 mice Read the full article https://t.co/JUHXgecTe6 #CellBiology #Mycology
Biochemistry, Biophysics and Molecular Biology

Main article text

 

Introduction

Materials & Methods

Animals

Culture of Cryptococcus gattii and heat inactivation of yeasts

Protocol of immunization of mice in association with adjuvant P3C4

Fungal burden in the lungs measured by CFU

Serum immunoglobulin isotyping

Quantification of the levels of IgG and IgM antibodies specific to GXM

Quantification of cytokine levels in the lungs

Phenotyping of immune cells in the pulmonary tissue by flow cytometry

Analysis of the profile of CD4+ T cells and macrophage subtypes in the lung tissue by qRT-PCR

Histopathological and morphometric analysis of the pulmonary tissue

Statistical analysis

Results

Adjuvant P3C4 does not favor the development of immunoglobulin isotypes with effector function against C. gattii

High doses of adjuvant P3C4 downregulate the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the lungs

The frequency of TLR2+ cells in the lungs is altered by administration of the adjuvant P3C4

Low doses of the adjuvant P3C4 provide a predominance of the transcription factor Foxp3 in the lung tissue

Adjuvant P3C4 is unable to contribute to the reduction of the C. gattii burden in the lungs

Low doses of the adjuvant P3C4 reduced the percentage of pulmonary parenchymal affected by inflammatory infiltrate

Discussion

Conclusions

Supplemental Information

Author Checklist

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.14778/supp-2

Additional Information and Declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare there are no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Gabriela Yamazaki de Campos and Thiago Aparecido da Silva conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Patrícia Kellen Martins Oliveira-Brito and Javier Emilio Lazo Chica performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.

Júlia Garcia Guimarães and Letícia Serafim da Costa performed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.

Animal Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

All animal experiments were approved by the Committee on Ethics in Animal Research of Ribeirão Preto Medical School (protocol 072/2019).

Data Availability

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw measurements are available in the Supplementary File.

Funding

This work was supported by the Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (Grant Numbers 2018/18538-0, 2018/19949-4, 2019/09260-1, 2019/09261-8, 2019/26074-7, 2021/02758-4), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) (Grant Number 431853/2018-5). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

2 Citations 1,280 Views 95 Downloads

MIT

Your institution may have Open Access funds available for qualifying authors. See if you qualify

Publish for free

Comment on Articles or Preprints and we'll waive your author fee
Learn more

Five new journals in Chemistry

Free to publish • Peer-reviewed • From PeerJ
Find out more