Effects of oxygen exposure on relative nucleic acid content and membrane integrity in the human gut microbiota

View article
Loading...
Microbiology

Main article text

 

Introduction

Methods

Sample collection

Aerobic and anaerobic conditions

Gut microbiota sample preparation

Flow cytometry acquisition

Statistical analysis

DNA extraction and 16S gene amplicon bioinformatics analysis

Data availability

Results

Bacterial physiology varies across individuals but is stable over time within individuals

Changes in bacterial physiology in response to oxygen exposure are individual-dependent

Bacterial physiology does not change over the course of 6 h in anoxic conditions

Short-term oxygen exposure does not alter bacterial diversity

Discussion

Conclusions

Supplemental Information

Raw data for Figure 2, panels A and B, acquired on the Canto flow cytometer.

Raw data for Flow cytometry cell counts for individuals A-G (Figs. 2A and 2B) obtained after acquisition on the Canto flow cytometer. Sample label, mean fluorescence and scatter, gated counts for cells and reference beads, volumes of beads and sample are all provided. Cell abundances are obtained using the gated counts on FlowJo, reference beads concentration, and sample volume. Proportions of HNA, LNA, and Pi cells are calculated relative to the total cell counts obtained by SybrGreen staining. Concentration of reference beads for each acquisition date are found in rows 199-203. Data used in Figures are in columns X (%HNA) and P (Pi+).

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10602/supp-1

Raw data for Figure 2, panels A-B, acquired on the Calibur flow cytometer.

Raw data obtained after acquisition on the Calibur flow cytometer for 9 of the 19 individuals in Figure 2 A and B. Fresh fecal samples were immediately placed in the anaerobic chamber, prepared as discussed in the methods, and stained with either Sybr Green I or with PI. Each sample was stained and acquired in triplicate, with values averaged. Data presented in the manuscript correspond to the averages. The letter codes for each individual is the same as in the Figure 1. Sample label and gated counts for cells and reference beads are provided. Cell abundances are obtained using the gated counts on FlowJo, reference beads concentration, and sample volume. The columns contain the counts for each gate (beads, HNA, LNA, PI), and the rows represent the different samples with the first letter representing the individual, followed by the stain, and by the staining techical replicate.Proportions of HNA, LNA, and Pi cells are calculated relative to the total cell counts obtained by SybrGreen staining.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10602/supp-2

Raw data for Figure 2, panels C to F.

Raw data of longitudinal study of individual H. Fresh fecal samples were immediately placed in an anaerobic chamber twice a week for 2 months, to assess the intra-individual variation over time in the proportions of HNA and PI+ cells in the human gut microbiota. Raw data from the gates imported from FlowJo are noted, each column is a unique gate, and rows are samples over time.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10602/supp-3

Raw data for Figure 3, panels A-B.

Cell counts, including calculations based off bead concentrations (obtained in Sheet "Beads") obtained by flow cytometry. The T0 values for individuals H, I, and J are also incorporated in Figure 2A, B. Data used in figures is found in rows 17 to 91 in columns W (%HNA), Z (%LNA) and rows 95-169 in column I (PI+); we used the average values obtained from the technical replicates. A is for Aerobic storage; CH is Chamber, and GP is Gaspack. T6 is the 6 h timepoint.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10602/supp-4

Raw data for Figure 3, panels A-B.

Raw data imported from FlowJo for each gate on each sample. Each gate is noted in columns C-F, followed by dilution factors and volumes required to determine cell abundances.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10602/supp-5

Raw data and Flow cytometry cell counts for Figure 3 C, D.

Sample codes in column A are labeled as follows: timepoint - one letter to identify the individual - storage condition (C for Chamber, A or G for anaerobic gas pack) - the stain - the technical replicate - the date for individuals A-G (Fig 2A, B) obtained after acquisition on the Canto flow cytometer. Sample label, mean fluorescence and scatter, gated counts for cells and reference beads, volumes of beads and sample are all provided. Cell abundances are obtained using the gated counts on FlowJo, reference beads concentration (noted on sheet "Beads concentration"), and sample volume. Proportions of HNA, LNA, and Pi cells are calculated relative to the total cell counts obtained by SybrGreen staining. Rows highlighted in yellow correspond to samples where we averaged the bead counts from the other two technical replicates due to a technical issue during acquisition (clog, bubble, or beads that were too concentrated). Values in column V and AG were used as data points in the figures.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10602/supp-6

Median SSC values between HNA and LNA cells.

Left: Acquired on the Calibur (N=28); Right: Acquired on the Canto (N= 33). Statistical significance was assessed as a paired t-test, error bars represent SD. *** P<0.0001.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10602/supp-7

Absolute cell abundances in each oxygen exposure condition.

Statistical significance was assessed with repeated measures one way ANOVA with Dunnet’s multiple comparisons test. Paired samples are connected by a line between oxygen exposure conditions (n=8). * P<0.05.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10602/supp-8

The diversity of the initial community does not reflect the proportion of HNA or PI+ bacteria after oxygen exposure for 6 hours.

Spearman correlation between the weighted UniFrac distances of the initial population to the proportion of HNA (left) or PI+ (right) bacteria after oxygen exposure (N = 10 individuals, 3 oxygen exposure conditions each, pairwise comparisons).

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10602/supp-9

Additional Information and Declarations

Competing Interests

Corinne F. Maurice is an Academic Editor for PeerJ.

Author Contributions

Mariia Taguer conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.

Ophélie Quillier conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.

Corinne F. Maurice conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.

Human Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

Human studies were performed with approval of the McGill Ethics Research Board (REB #A04-M27-15B).

DNA Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of DNA sequences:

Bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequencing data is available at the SRA database: PRJNA656580.

Data Availability

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Raw numeric data for flow cytometry (Figs. 13) are available in the Supplemental Files.

Flow cytometry files can be accessed on the Flow Repository: FR-FCM-Z3YJ and FR-FCM-Z323.

Funding

This work was supported by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) fellowship awarded to Mariia Taguer, the Canada Research Chair program (950-230748 X-242502), a Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) transition grant to Corinne F. Maurice (PJT-149098), and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1139814). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

6 Citations 1,273 Views 331 Downloads

MIT

Your institution may have Open Access funds available for qualifying authors. See if you qualify

Publish for free

Comment on Articles or Preprints and we'll waive your author fee
Learn more

Five new journals in Chemistry

Free to publish • Peer-reviewed • From PeerJ
Find out more