WT-HE Net: A multimodal deep learning framework integrating Whirling Triangle based geometric texture features and Homomorphic Encryption for brain tumor analysis


Abstract

Accurate and secure classification of brain tumors from magnetic resonance imaging remains a critical problem in medical image analysis. Deep convolutional models deliver strong predictive performance but often require large, diverse datasets and offer limited interpretability. At the same time, radiologists face significant diagnostic challenges due to subtle textural variations, heterogeneous tumor morphology and restricted access to multiparametric imaging. These clinical difficulties are further compounded by strict privacy regulations that limit the sharing of patient images. To address these issues, we propose a hybrid framework that combines mathematically defined Whirling Triangle partitioning for localized handcrafted feature extraction, convolutional neural network based image embeddings, and a CKKS homomorphic encryption–enabled inference pipeline demonstrating secure predictions without revealing plaintext data. The Whirling Triangle decomposition produces multi-scale triangular subregions from which we extract intensity, gradient and textural descriptors (including Local Binary Patterns and Gray-Level Co-occurrence Matrix), which are fused with deep image features to produce a compact, discriminative representation. Experiments were conducted on a dataset of 7,023 T1-weighted contrast-enhanced axial brain tumor MRI images which shows 98.0% accuracy in the plaintext setting and 96.7% accuracy under encrypted inference.
Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.

  • PeerJ Computer Science does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at [email protected].