A fusion learning breakthrough for influenza forecasting: Multivariate decomposition integrated with regulated kernel ridge intelligence


Abstract

Forecasting influenza-like illness (ILI) is critical for public health management, enabling timely actions and resource allocation to mitigate the consequences of epidemics. This study proposes RWKRidge, a novel fusion model that combines a regulated generalized ridge model (GRM) with kernel ridge regression. The model is also hybridized with the GRM via a weighted geometric mean relationship and optimized using the MS-DEPSO method. The proposed model is utilized to predict ILI rates in three areas of the United States: Mountain, South Atlantic, and West South-Central. This study presents a feature selection technique using recursive feature elimination (RFE) in conjunction with the Ridge model. Additionally, it is designed an optimum multi-variate variational mode decomposition (OMVMD) to enhance prediction accuracy. The findings indicate that the OMVMD-RWKRidge-GRM model outperforms four other machine learning (ML) models (i.e., least squares support vector machine (LSSVM), Deep extreme learning machine (DELM), long short-term memory (LSTM), and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)) in predicting ILI rates. It gained R values of 0.989 (training) and 0.992 (testing), along with the lowest RMSE and MAPE measurements. Based on the results of this comprehensive analysis, OMVMD-RWKRidge-GLM is the best approach for creating precise predictions with a minimal possibility of uncertainty. Forecasts made using the suggested technique can be relied upon by public health experts to effectively manage and mitigate the impact of influenza outbreaks, especially due to its higher accuracy in comparison to existing ML models.
Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.

  • PeerJ Computer Science does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at [email protected].