Contrast in the density and biomass of fish in a reef system with different fishing intensity in the Mexican Caribbean


Abstract

A wide range of fish species are caught in reef fisheries. However, fishing efforts tend to be highly selective in favor of large species, which generally have low population growth rates, making them more vulnerable to overfishing. When the decline of large predators occurs, fishing efforts start to focus on catching species from lower trophic levels, which can cause a trophic cascade effect.The objective of this research was to detect changes in the density and biomass of fish communities in areas with different fishing intensity in the study area.This study was carried out in Banco Chinchorro in the Mexican Caribbean and analyze the effect of fishing intensity on fish density and biomass, comparing data obtained from visual censuses with dependent information of the fishery. Evidence was found of a relationship between high fishing exploitation and low levels of density and biomass for Epinephelus striatus, E. guttatus and Lachnolaimus maximus. The decline of predators of non-commercial species had no effect on the density and biomass of these species. Both the density and biomass of the fish in the areas studied were influenced by the presence of algae, octocorals, hydrocorals and by variations in the CPUE.This study detected that density and biomass have decreased in some species belonging to the Serranidae and Lutjanidae families in areas with high fishing intensity. On the other hand, little evidence was found that the density and total biomass of families of noncommercially important species increased through the decline of their predators. Finally, although attempts were made to reduce the effect of structural complexity on the density and biomass of fish species, it was found that certain benthic groups and CPUE explained the observed changes in the density and biomass of fish assemblages.
Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.

  • PeerJ does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at peer.review@peerj.com.