Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Natália Rizzo Friol conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Flávio de Barros Molina conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Hussam El Dine Zaher conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Animal Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

CEUA (Comissão de Ética no Uso de Animais). Full information will be provided at publication.

Field Study Permissions

The following information was supplied relating to field study approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

SISBIO (Sistema de Autorização e Informação em Biodiversidade) and CEUA (Comissão de Ética no Uso de Animais). Full information will be provided at publication.

DNA Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of DNA sequences:

We use DNA sequences publicly available from GenBank and new sequences. The new sequences will be uploaded to a database and provided before publication.

Funding

NRF was supported by a Master's Dissertation scholarship from Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Tecnológico (CNPq). This research was supported by grants from Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) and CNPq to HZ. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies