Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

General Health Quality Questionnaire

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.981v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Chinmay T Jani conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables.

Tejas Desai performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Sonal Parikh analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Aashka A Shah performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools.

Sonali Katara performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools.

Human Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

The study protocol was reviewed by the members of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Smt N.H.L. Municipal Medical College and they gave an official approval for carrying out the study. Also, written informed consent was taken from all subjects.

Funding

The authors declare there was no external funding for this work.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies