Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Self generated verbs from study 1

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.903v1/supp-1

Verb and Label rating data for study 2

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.903v1/supp-2

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Author Contributions

Emma Portch conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Jelena Havelka conceived and designed the experiments, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Charity Brown conceived and designed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Roger Giner-Sorolla conceived and designed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Human Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

Approval was obtained from the School of Psychology's internal ethics committee at the University of Leeds. This committee follows the guidelines set out by the British Psychological Society’s code of conduct, ethical principles and guidelines (1993). The research was approved on the 24th of February, 2013 and assigned the following ethics reference: 13-0032. Both study 1 and 2 were approved under the same ethics code (application title: 'Processing different emotion words: obtaining affective norms for British English'). Approval was acknowledged via email.

Funding

This work was supported by an ESRC studentship, awarded to the first author. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies