A new method to analyze species abundances in space using generalized dimensions
- Published
- Accepted
- Subject Areas
- Computational Biology, Ecology, Mathematical Biology
- Keywords
- species-rank surface, species-area relationship, multifractals, multi-species spatial pattern., species abundance distribution
- Copyright
- © 2015 Saravia
- Licence
- This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ PrePrints) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
- Cite this article
- 2015. A new method to analyze species abundances in space using generalized dimensions. PeerJ PrePrints 3:e745v4 https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.745v4
Abstract
Species-area relationships (SAR) and species abundance distributions (SAD) are among the most studied patterns in ecology, due to their application in both theoretical and conservation issues. One problem with these general patterns is that different theories can generate the same predictions, and for this reason they can not be used to detect different mechanisms. A solution for this is to search for more sensitive patterns. One possibility is to extend the SAR to the whole species abundance distribution. A generalized dimension (\(D_q\)) approach has been proposed to study the scaling of SAD, but there has been no evaluation of the ability of this pattern to detect different mechanisms. An equivalent way to express SAD is the rank abundance distribution (RAD). Here I introduce a new way to study scaling of SAD using a spatial version of RAD: the species-rank surface (SRS), which can be analyzed using \(D_q\). Thus there is an old \(D_q\) based on SAR (\(D_q^{SAD}\)), and a new one based on SRS (\(D_q^{SRS}\)). I perform spatial simulations to relate both \(D_q\) with SAD, spatial patterns and number of species. Finally I compare the power of both \(D_q\), SAD, SAR exponent, and the fractal information dimension to detect different community patterns using a continuum of hierarchical and neutral spatially explicit models. The SAD, \(D_q^{SAD}\) and \(D_q^{SRS}\) all had good performance in detecting models with contrasting mechanisms. \(D_q^{SRS}\) had a better fit to data and a strong ability to compare between hierarchical communities where the other methods failed. The SAR exponent and information dimension had low power and should not be used. SRS and \(D_q^{SRS}\) could be an interesting addition to study community or macroecological patterns.
Author Comment
This is the version resubmitted to MEE, with more explanations and clarifications about methods and some additional interpretations of the metrics.