Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Supplemental tables including phylogenetic data matrices and character lists

Supplemental Tables (S1-S6): S1, Specimens used for comparative studies with SHGM L275; S2-S5, Phylogenetic data matrices and character lists; S6, Spore taxa found in the Lai Chi Chong Formation.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.725v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Tze-Kei Tse performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Michael Pittman conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Meemann Chang analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Funding

This study was supported by a Summer Research Fellowship awarded to TKT by the Faculty of Science of the University of Hong Kong. The stereo microscope and photographic equipment used were purchased with equipment funds awarded to MP by the Faculty of Science and the Department of Earth Sciences. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies