Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Light intensity (lux) data collected in Hengam coral patches at depths of about 3 and 6m during the warm season

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.713v1/supp-1

Exemplary data set indicating the light intensity during the experiments

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.713v1/supp-2

Data of the experiment one: exposure to average and peak seasonal temperatures

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.713v1/supp-3

Data of the experiment two: exposure to gradual deviation toward seasonal temperature extremes

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.713v1/supp-4

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Jahangir Vajed Samiei conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Abolfazl Saleh performed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Ali Mehdinia reviewed drafts of the paper.

Arash Shirvani performed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Mohsen Kayal analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Funding

This work was a part of the project No. 391-011-01 funded by the Iranian National Institute for Oceanography and Atmospheric Science. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies