Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

NESCent Sexual Selection Studies Meeting Report

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.680v3/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

Simon C. Griffith is an Academic Editor for PeerJ.

Author Contributions

Joan Roughgarden analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper, contributed to meeting report.

Elizabeth Adkins-Regan reviewed drafts of the paper, contributed to meeting report.

Erol Akçay analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper, contributed to meeting report.

Jeremy Chase Crawford reviewed drafts of the paper, contributed to meeting report.

Raghavendra Gadagkar reviewed drafts of the paper, contributed to meeting report.

Simon C. Griffith wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper, contributed to meeting report.

Camilla A. Hinde reviewed drafts of the paper, contributed to meeting report.

Thierry Hoquet reviewed drafts of the paper, contributed to meeting report.

Cailin O’Connor reviewed drafts of the paper, contributed to meeting report.

Zofia M. Prokop reviewed drafts of the paper, contributed to meeting report.

Richard O. Prum reviewed drafts of the paper, contributed to meeting report.

Sharoni Shafir reviewed drafts of the paper, contributed to meeting report.

Samuel S. Snow reviewed drafts of the paper, contributed to meeting report.

Daniel Taylor reviewed drafts of the paper, contributed to meeting report.

Jeremy Van Cleve analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper, contributed to meeting report.

Michael Weisberg reviewed drafts of the paper, contributed to meeting report.

Funding

The Catalysis Meeting was supported by the National Evolutionary Synthesis Center (NESCent), NSF #EF-0423641. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies