Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

3 Figures and 2 Tables

Table S1 Top ten bacterial genera based on OTU number among the cave samples.

Table S2 Top ten OTU’s based on total read count number among the cave samples.

Figure S1 Graphical representation of the relative abundance of bacterial diversity from phylum to species level of CFP using Krona visualization tool.

Figure S2 Graphical representation of the relative abundance of bacterial diversity from phylum to species level of CLP using Krona visualization tool.

Figure S3 Graphical representation of the relative abundance of bacterial diversity from phylum to species level of CMP using Krona visualization tool.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.631v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Surajit De Mandal conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables.

Zothan Sanga conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Senthil Kumar Nachimuthu conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

DNA Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of DNA sequences:

EBI Sequence Read Archive, Project Number PRJEB7730 and ERP008676.

Funding

This research was funded by a grant from the State Biotech Hub sponsored by the Department of Biotechnology, Govt. of India, New Delhi. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies