Download
Share
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Comparing the influence of ecology journals using citation-based indices: making sense of a multitude of metrics

  Natural Resources and the Environment, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, United States
DOI
10.7287/peerj.preprints.43v2
Published
Accepted
Subject Areas
Ecology
Keywords
impact factor, Eigenfactor, e-index, h-index, Article Influence, Citation metrics, SNIP, SJR, bibliometrics, scientometric indices
Copyright
© 2014 Hocking
Licence
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Cite this article
Hocking DJ. 2014. Comparing the influence of ecology journals using citation-based indices: making sense of a multitude of metrics. PeerJ PrePrints 2:e43v2

Abstract

The links among scholarly citations creates a tremendous network that reveals patterns of influence and flows of ideas. The systematic evaluation of the networks can be used to create aggregate measures of journal influence. To understand the citation patterns and compare influence among ecology journals, I complied 11 popular metrics for 110 ecology journals: Journal Impact Factor (JIF), 5-year Journal Impact Factor (JIF), Eigenfactor, Article Influence (AI), Source-Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP), SCImago Journal Report (SJR), h-index, hc-index, e-index, g-index, and AR-index. All metrics were positively correlated among ecology journals; however, there was still considerable variation among metrics. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution, and Systematics, Trends in Ecology and Evolution, and Ecology Letters were the top three journals across metrics on a per article basis. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, Ecology, and Molecular Ecology had the greatest overall influence on science, as indicated by the Eigenfactor. There was much greater variability among the other metrics because they focus on the mostly highly cited papers from each journal. Each influence metric has its own strengths and weaknesses, and therefore its own uses. Researchers interested in average influence of articles in a journal would be best served by referring to the AI scores or possibly SJR values.

Supplemental Information

Citation metric data for 111 ecology journals

Text format with comma separation, 1 header line, Classic Mac line endings

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.43v2/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

There are no competing interests to declare.

Author Contributions

Daniel J. Hocking conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Funding

The research was conducted on personal time and did not received external funding support. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Feedback on other revisions

Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
Download
Content
Alert
Just enter your email

Download article

Comparing the influence of ecology journals using citation-based indices: making sense of a multitude of metrics
PDF Save to Mendeley RIS XML BibTeX
  Visitors   Views   Downloads