Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Supplementary File 1 (code and commands used to perform the analyses)

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.386v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare there are no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Frédéric Mahé conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Torbjørn Rognes conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Christopher Quince analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Colomban de Vargas wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Micah Dunthorn conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Grant Disclosures

The following grant information was disclosed by the authors:

EU EraNet BiodivErsA program BioMarKs (grant # 2008-6530)

French government "Investissements d’Avenir" project OCEANOMICS (grant ANR-11-BTBR-0008)

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (grant # DU1319/1-1)

EPSRC Career Acceleration Fellowship (grant # EP/H003851/1)

Funding

F.M. and C.deV. were supported by the EU EraNet BiodivErsA program BioMarKs (grant # 2008-6530) and the French government "Investissements d’Avenir" project OCEANOMICS (ANR-11-BTBR-0008) and the EU FP7 program MicroB3 (contract number 287589). F.M and M.D. were supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (grant #DU1319/1-1). T.R. was supported by a Centre of Excellence grant from the Research Council of Norway to CMBN. C.Q. is funded by an EPSRC Career Acceleration Fellowship – EP/H003851/1. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies