NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

A newer version of this Preprint is available: View the latest version

Supplemental Information

Supplemental Table S1

Abbreviations for figures 1 - 3 and 7.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3496v2/supp-1

Supplemental Table S2

Quartile proportions of vitellogenic oocyte (VO) diameters (maximum, upper quartile, mean, median, lower quartile and minimum) among F0, FII and FIV stage females.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3496v2/supp-2

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Valentina B. Durkina conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

John W. Chapman conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Natalia L. Demchenko conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Scholar's Archive (pending possible acceptance in PeerJ)

Accession Number forthcoming if paper is accepted.

Funding

Support for sample collections and partial financial support of NLD for sample analyses were provided by Exxon Neftegas, Ltd. No А2308506, by Sakhalin Energy Investment Co and partly by a grant to NLD from the Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences 13-III-B- 06-057. JWC and VBD were not funded. The funders supported the collection of the samples but did not collect the samples for the express purpose of this study and did not participate in these analyses, decisions to publish or in the preparation of the manuscript. NLD did not receive other funding (whether external or internal to her organization) that was reported previously.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
1 Citation   Views   Downloads