NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Zootechnical parameters on shrimp experimental trials, water quality and total lipid and carotenoid content in shrimp

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3446v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Regina Elizondo-González conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Eduardo Quiroz-Guzmán performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Cristina Escobedo-Fregoso conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Paola Magallón-Servín analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Alberto Peña-Rodríguez conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Field Study Permissions

The following information was supplied relating to field study approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

Wild collection of native Ulva sp. (sea lettuce) provided by the Secretary of agriculture, Animal breeding, Rural development, Fisheries and Food (Secretaria de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación) CONAPESCA, México.

Funding

This work was supported by Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT) México (Project No. 2015-01-1680). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
2 Citations   Views   Downloads