NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Cintia Garro conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Antonio Brun conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Enrique Caviedes-Vidal conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Animal Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

All animal procedures adhered to institutional animal use regulations and approved animal use protocols by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the UNSL, protocol number B212/15.

Field Study Permissions

The following information was supplied relating to field study approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

Captured animals were approved by the Environmental Office of the state of San Luis, resolution number 75-PBD-2015.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The research in this article did not generate any code.

Funding

Funding was provided by the National Science Foundation (IOS-1025886 to WHK and ECV), Consejo de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET PIP834 to ECV), Universidad Nacional de San Luis (CyT 2-0814 to ECV) and the Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
2 Citations   Views   Downloads