Visitors   Views   Downloads

Comprehensive comparison of four species of Onchidiidae provides insights on morphological and molecular adaptations of invertebrates from shallow seas to wetlands

View preprint
19 days ago
Comprehensive comparison of four species of Onchidiidae provides insights on morphological and molecular adaptations of invertebrates from shallow seas to wetlands https://t.co/FquUk0zVWK
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Guolv Xu conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Tiezhu Yang conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools.

Dongfeng Wang performed the experiments.

Jie Li performed the experiments.

Xin Liu performed the experiments.

Xin Wu performed the experiments.

Heding Shen conceived and designed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

DNA Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of DNA sequences:

The Nonmuscle myosin heavy chain II sequences described here are accessible via GenBank accession number KU663401. The Myosin heavy chain sequences described here are accessible via GenBank accession number KU550708.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data/code is included in the manuscript .

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.41276157), Shanghai Universities First-class Disciplines Project of Fisheries. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies