Visitors   Views   Downloads

Sex differences in the use of social information emerge under conditions of risk

View preprint
Sex differences in the use of social information emerge under conditions of risk https://t.co/pqSdTFgPgC
Preprint: Sex differences in the use of social information emerge under conditions of risk https://t.co/TcHBUI4eN5 https://t.co/Uoa2CtMPDQ
@denormalize Our public api is https://t.co/rv9IulE6AW but for what you're doing https://t.co/61zbe8sPvp<preprint id>.json (ex: https://t.co/zdEXdFo2KG)?
82 days ago
Sex differences in the use of social information emerge under conditions of risk https://t.co/0oIByr3Biu
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Charlotte Olivia Brand conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Gillian R Brown conceived and designed the experiments, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Catharine P Cross conceived and designed the experiments, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Human Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

The University of St Andrews granted ethical approval to carry out this study.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

https://github.com/lottybrand22/GH_RiskySpaceships/

Funding

This work was supported by the John Templeton Foundation The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies