NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Astrocyte and Microglia measurements

Mean and standard deviation of astrocyte diameter, process length and thickness and distribution, and microglia cell area and distribution

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3066v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Constanza Stefania Meneses performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Heine Yacob Müller analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Daniel Eduardo Herzberg prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Benjamín Uberti performed the experiments, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Hedie Almagro Bustamante conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Marianne Patricia Werner conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Animal Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

Universidad Austral de Chile Ethics and Bioethic Committee for the Use of Animals in Research has approved this project (Nº001/2017)

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

C.Meneses raw data Peer J

Funding

This work was supported by the Dirección de Investigación y Desarrollo, Universidad Austral de Chile, Project S-2014-26. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
  Visitors   Views   Downloads