NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Table with information on investigated specimens

Supplemental Table S1. Table with information on investigated specimens: taxa, geographical origins, collection number, scan details, sinus morphotypes.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2923v1/supp-1

llustration of the paranasal sinuses and recesses in different specimens of Dasypus kappleri

Supplemental Figure S2. Illustration of the paranasal sinuses and recesses in different specimens of Dasypus kappleri, with geographical information. Skulls not to scale.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2923v1/supp-2

Raw Data

Raw data: images of all virtually reconstructed paranasal sinuses in our dataset.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2923v1/supp-3

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Guillaume Billet conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Lionel Hautier conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Benoit de Thoisy contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Frédéric Delsuc conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Funding

This work has benefited from an "Investissements d’Avenir' grant managed by Agence Nationale de la Recherche, France (CEBA, ref. ANR-10-LABX-25-01). This research received support from the Synthesys Project (http://synthesys3.myspecies.info/), which is financed by the European Community Research Infrastructure Action under the FP7. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
1 Citation   Views   Downloads