Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Supporting data for Pepper & Nettle (2013) Perceived extrinsic mortality and health behaviour: Testing a behavioural ecological model

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.29v2/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Author Contributions

Gillian V Pepper conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper.

Daniel Nettle conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper.

Human Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

The study received ethical approval from the Newcastle University Faculty of Medical Sciences Ethics Committee: reference 00533/2012

Funding

This work was undertaken as part of a PhD studentship funded by the Newcastle University Institute of Neuroscience. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies