Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

S1 Table. Minimal Pair Stimuli

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2870v2/supp-1

S2 Table. Stimuli for the Primed Lexical Decision Task

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2870v2/supp-2

S3 Table. Analyses with the Control Variable “Talker”

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2870v2/supp-3

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Anastasia Giannakopoulou conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Helen Brown performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Meghan Clayards conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Elizabeth Wonnacott conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Human Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

This project received ethical consent by the ethical committee of the University of Warwick (Ethical Application Ref: 80/12-13), abiding to the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki. For children,

written informed consent was obtained from their parents prior to the first session. Adults provided written consent at the beginning of the first session. Participants received a certificate and small gift at the end of the experiment.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The analyses scripts and output can be viewed here:

http://rpubs.com/ewonnacott/247911.

For data files and scripts see the Open Science Framework, available at:

https://osf.io/8anzk/.

For a full break down of means by condition, please refer to the accompanying R script, available at: http://rpubs.com/ewonnacott/247911.

For a full break down of means at pre- and post-test by condition, please refer to the accompanying R script, available at: http://rpubs.com/ewonnacott/247911.

Funding

The work was supported by the British Academy Small Grant, a grant awarded to EW and MC (SG111965), a grant awarded to EW and HB from the Economic and Social Research Council (ES/K013637/2), and by a grant awarded to AG by the Research Centre for Applied Psychology, University of Bedfordshire. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies