NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Ralph Simon conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.

Judith Varkevisser conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.

Ezequiel Mendoza conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.

Klaus Hochradel conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, provided soft- and hardware to controll the RoboFinch, and approved the final draft.

Constance Scharff conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.

Katharina Riebel conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.

Wouter Halfwerk conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.

Animal Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

Leiden University Animal Welfare Body provided approval for this research.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Raw data is not submitted as this is only a conference contribution with preliminary results.

Funding

This work was funded by the Human Frontier Science Program (No RGP0046/2016). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
  Visitors   Views   Downloads