Phylogeny of Libellulidae: are there relationships between molecular phylogenetics and morphological analysis of wing shape of dragonflies?
- Published
- Accepted
- Subject Areas
- Ecology, Entomology, Evolutionary Studies, Taxonomy
- Keywords
- Dragonflies, Molecular taxonomy, Morphological taxonomy, Libellulidae, Interspecific relationship, Wing, Clustering, Phylogeny
- Copyright
- © 2019 Huang et al.
- Licence
- This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ Preprints) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
- Cite this article
- 2019. Phylogeny of Libellulidae: are there relationships between molecular phylogenetics and morphological analysis of wing shape of dragonflies? PeerJ Preprints 7:e27958v1 https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.27958v1
Abstract
Background: Establishing the species limits and resolving phylogenetic relationships are primary goals of taxonomists and evolutionary biologists. At present, a controversial question is about interspecific phylogenetic information in morphological features. Are the interspecific relationships established based on genetic information consistent with the traditional classification system? To address these problems, this study analyzed the wing shape structure of 10 species of Libellulidae, explored the relationship between wing shape and dragonfly behavior and living habits, and established an interspecific morphological relationship tree based on wing shape data. By analyzing the sequences of mitochondrial COI gene and the nuclear genes 18S, 28S rRNA and ITS in 10 species of dragonflies, the interspecific relationship was established. Method: The wing shape information of the male forewings and hindwings was obtained by the geometric morphometrics method. The inter-species wing shape relationship was obtained by principal component analysis (PCA) in MorphoJ1.06 software. The inter-species wing shape relationship tree was obtained by cluster analysis (UPGMA) using Mesquite3.2 software. The COI, 18S, ITS and 28S genes of 10 species dragonfly were blasted and processed by BioEdit v6 software. The maximum parsimony (MP) tree was established by Puap4.0 software. The Bayes inference (BI) tree was established by MrBayes 3.2.6 in Geneious software. Results: The main difference in forewings among the 10 species of dragonfly was the apical, radial and discoidal regions dominated by the wing nodus. In contrast, the main difference among the hindwings was the apical and anal regions dominated by the wing nodus. The change in wing shape was closely related to the ability of dragonfly to migrate. The interspecific relationship based on molecular data showed that the species of Orthetrum genus branched independently of the other species. Compared to the molecular tree of 10 species, the wing shape clustering showed some phylogenetic information on the forewing shape (with large differences in the forewing shape tree vs. molecular tree), and there was no interspecific phylogenetic information of the hindwing shape tree vs. molecular tree. Conclusion: The dragonfly wing shape characteristics are closely related to its migration ability. Species with strong ability to migrate have the forewing shape that is longer and narrower, and have larger anal region, whereas the species that prefer short-distance hovering or standing still for a long time have forewing that are wider and shorter, and the anal region is smaller. Integrating morphological and molecular data to evaluate the relationship among dragonfly species shows there is some interspecific phylogenetic information in the forewing shape and none in the hindwing shape. The various regions of the forewing and hindwing are inconsistent, which may be due to their different functions.
Author Comment
This is a submission to PeerJ for review.
Supplemental Information
The 24 landmarks on forewing of 10 species of dragonflies
Landmark data were subjected to generalized procrustes superimposition to standardize. All standardized data were converted into a two-dimensional data format.
The 25 landmarks on hindwing of 10 species of dragonflies
Landmark data were subjected to generalized procrustes superimposition to standardize. All standardized data were converted into a two-dimensional data format.
