Visitors   Views   Downloads

Microevolutionary processes on railway tracks in Geranium robertianum populations

View preprint
632 days ago
Microevolutionary processes on railway tracks in Geranium robertianum populations https://t.co/ijvxnlhYvM https://t.co/hSvNMstdgq
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Raw data for charts and tables

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27793v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Olga Bemowska-Kałabun conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Paweł Wąsowicz conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Łukasz Napora-Rutkowski performed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Zuzanna Nowak-Życzyńska approved the final draft, advised on genetic research.

Małgorzata Wierzbicka conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

- Biometric data and relative anthocyanins content data (figures: 3-6, 8-12).

- Matrix 1, data for genetic analyzes (table 3, table 4, figure 13a, figure 14a, table 6).

- Matrix 2, data for genetic analyzes (table 3, table 5, figure 13b, figure 14b, table 6).

Funding

The studies were financed by the National Science Centre, Poland, project no. 2011/03/B/NZ8/03044. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies