Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Raw data for Schgr-AKH-II bound to Schgr-AKHR in PDB format

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27641v1/supp-2

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Graham Ellis Jackson conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Elumalai Pavadai performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, approved the final draft.

Gerd Gäde conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Neils Andersen analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The coordinates of the Schistocerca gregaria receptor are supplied in supplementary file 1 in pdb format.

Funding

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 634361. The work is based on the research supported in part by the National Research Foundation of South Africa (Grant Numbers 93450 and 85466 to GEJ and 85768 to GG) and the University of Cape Town Research Committee. The Centre for High-Performance Computing (CHPC), South Africa, provided computational resources to this research project. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies