Visitors   Views   Downloads

UK universities compliance with the Concordat to Support Research Integrity: findings from cross-sectional time-series

View preprint
Embarassing. Universities' Compliance with #concordat #research #integrity. Interesting times ahead. Detailed study by @SideviewLiz https://t.co/3pmFsSI2FM https://t.co/EQFR7lSd3W
Here is the preprint of Liz's research @SideviewLiz https://t.co/dvwtnbKcdc Me, Norman Lamb, Liz Wager, raising v serious concerns. Really interested in how the room responds. As always no doubt there will be those wanting to work for change, and those wanting to defend stasis.
76 days ago
RT @SideviewLiz: Almost half of UK universities aren't complying with the #Concordat requirement to publish a #ResearchIntegrity contact pe…
Nearly 7 years since the Concordat on Research Integrity was published but what impact has it had? Not much if you're looking for contact details at UK universities or annual RI reports according to my study https://t.co/pZvunTs272 https://t.co/FSosJqFXba
RT @SideviewLiz: Almost half of UK universities aren't complying with the #Concordat requirement to publish a #ResearchIntegrity contact pe…
RT @SideviewLiz: Almost half of UK universities aren't complying with the #Concordat requirement to publish a #ResearchIntegrity contact pe…
RT @SideviewLiz: Almost half of UK universities aren't complying with the #Concordat requirement to publish a #ResearchIntegrity contact pe…
Almost half of UK universities aren't complying with the #Concordat requirement to publish a #ResearchIntegrity contact person. See my @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/pZvunTarfu
UK universities compliance with the Concordat to Support Research Integrity: findings from cross-sectional time-series https://t.co/134LLg4hvo https://t.co/8gjABEupcn
78 days ago
UK universities compliance with the Concordat to Support Research Integrity: findings from cross-sectional time-series https://t.co/E6gOcJZ1G5 https://t.co/6KKXcBjI6t
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Informal survey of US and Australian universities

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27622v1/supp-3

Survey of annual RI reports 2018

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27622v1/supp-5

Additional Information

Competing Interests

Elizabeth Wager is a freelance consultant and has provided training for UK universities on research integrity. She was a member of the UKRIO Advisory Board until 2017.

Author Contributions

Elizabeth Wager conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Raw data from the surveys is provided in the original Excel spreadsheets

Funding

The work was funded jointly by Sideview (a company run by Elizabeth Wager) and the UK Research Integrity Office (UKRIO). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies