NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Supplementary Materials

Two figures and one table providing additional information.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27614v1/supp-1

actin gene sequences

Sequences submitted to GenBank but not yet appearing on GenBank website.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27614v1/supp-2

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Joshua I Brian conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Simon K Davy conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Shaun P Wilkinson conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

DNA Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of DNA sequences:

The actin sequences are accessible via GenBank accession numbers MK520897 – MK520906. This study also makes use of previously published sequences, which are available via GenBank, accession numbers MH236749 – MH236784 (cob, ITS2) and MH329431 – MH329571 (psbA).

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Raw data files for the ILD and AU tests, in addition to annotated exemplar code to run both analyses, are available on GitHub, via the URL https://github.com/brianjosh/Cladocopium_alignments

Funding

This work was supported by a William Georgetti Scholarship awarded to JIB and a Rutherford Foundation Trust Postdoctoral Award awarded to SPW. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
  Visitors   Views   Downloads