Visitors   Views   Downloads

A contrast of meta and metafor packages for meta-analyses in R

View preprint
RT @metanutter: nice succinct comparison of meta and metafor for the first time meta-analyst. by @cjlortie https://t.co/GPpTkChD9V
RT @metanutter: nice succinct comparison of meta and metafor for the first time meta-analyst. by @cjlortie https://t.co/GPpTkChD9V
87 days ago
RT @metanutter: nice succinct comparison of meta and metafor for the first time meta-analyst. by @cjlortie https://t.co/GPpTkChD9V
RT @metanutter: nice succinct comparison of meta and metafor for the first time meta-analyst. by @cjlortie https://t.co/GPpTkChD9V
RT @metanutter: nice succinct comparison of meta and metafor for the first time meta-analyst. by @cjlortie https://t.co/GPpTkChD9V
RT @metanutter: nice succinct comparison of meta and metafor for the first time meta-analyst. by @cjlortie https://t.co/GPpTkChD9V
nice succinct comparison of meta and metafor for the first time meta-analyst. by @cjlortie https://t.co/GPpTkChD9V
RT @cjlortie: #rstats #openscience discussion of two packages for #metas @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/EXJTzcd6X4 #ComputationalBiology #Dat…
@nceas @metamattj workshop outcome. Discussion to notes to this so I do not forget! https://t.co/ov1vtay0gr
@rOpenSci how did it do? Do you accept reviews of more than one package at once? https://t.co/ov1vtay0gr
90 days ago
RT @cjlortie: #rstats #openscience discussion of two packages for #metas @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/EXJTzcd6X4 #ComputationalBiology #Dat…
#rstats #openscience discussion of two packages for #metas @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/EXJTzcd6X4 #ComputationalBiology #DataScience @EcoFilazzola @mflormiguel
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Additional Information

Competing Interests

Christopher J Lortie is an Academic Editor for PeerJ.

Author Contributions

Christopher J Lortie conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, performed the computation work, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

figshare

https://figshare.com/articles/A_contrast_of_R_package_complexity_between_meta_and_metafor_/7877837

Funding

The authors received no funding for this work.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies