Ten myths around open scholarly publishing

RT @Protohedgehog: Should we be worried about this? Yes. These rankings are not only harmful for research, and based on proprietary data (i…
RT @Protohedgehog: Should we be worried about this? Yes. These rankings are not only harmful for research, and based on proprietary data (i…
RT @Protohedgehog: Should we be worried about this? Yes. These rankings are not only harmful for research, and based on proprietary data (i…
RT @Protohedgehog: Should we be worried about this? Yes. These rankings are not only harmful for research, and based on proprietary data (i…
RT @Protohedgehog: Should we be worried about this? Yes. These rankings are not only harmful for research, and based on proprietary data (i…
RT @Protohedgehog: Should we be worried about this? Yes. These rankings are not only harmful for research, and based on proprietary data (i…
RT @Protohedgehog: New at @PeerJPreprints: Ten myths around open scholarly publishing. We want your feedback! What did we get wrong? What c…
2459 days ago
RT @Protohedgehog: Should we be worried about this? Yes. These rankings are not only harmful for research, and based on proprietary data (i…
2459 days ago
RT @Protohedgehog: Should we be worried about this? Yes. These rankings are not only harmful for research, and based on proprietary data (i…
RT @Protohedgehog: Should we be worried about this? Yes. These rankings are not only harmful for research, and based on proprietary data (i…
RT @Protohedgehog: Should we be worried about this? Yes. These rankings are not only harmful for research, and based on proprietary data (i…
RT @Protohedgehog: Should we be worried about this? Yes. These rankings are not only harmful for research, and based on proprietary data (i…
2459 days ago
RT @Protohedgehog: Should we be worried about this? Yes. These rankings are not only harmful for research, and based on proprietary data (i…
RT @Protohedgehog: Should we be worried about this? Yes. These rankings are not only harmful for research, and based on proprietary data (i…
RT @Protohedgehog: Should we be worried about this? Yes. These rankings are not only harmful for research, and based on proprietary data (i…
RT @Protohedgehog: Should we be worried about this? Yes. These rankings are not only harmful for research, and based on proprietary data (i…
Should we be worried about this? Yes. These rankings are not only harmful for research, and based on proprietary data (i.e., completely non-reproducible), but Scopus is also systematically incomplete and biased in a huge number of ways (see eg Myth 9 https://t.co/zLNLoWqVJh) https://t.co/o5DjVr3kUf
2459 days ago
RT @FBNBehavPhys: In this week's Journal Club, we will be discussing "Ten myths around open scholarly publishing" by @Protohedgehog et al.…
RT @FBNBehavPhys: In this week's Journal Club, we will be discussing "Ten myths around open scholarly publishing" by @Protohedgehog et al.…
RT @Protohedgehog: New at @PeerJPreprints: Ten myths around open scholarly publishing. We want your feedback! What did we get wrong? What c…
RT @Protohedgehog: New at @PeerJPreprints: Ten myths around open scholarly publishing. We want your feedback! What did we get wrong? What c…
2462 days ago
RT @FBNBehavPhys: In this week's Journal Club, we will be discussing "Ten myths around open scholarly publishing" by @Protohedgehog et al.…
RT @FBNBehavPhys: In this week's Journal Club, we will be discussing "Ten myths around open scholarly publishing" by @Protohedgehog et al.…
RT @FBNBehavPhys: In this week's Journal Club, we will be discussing "Ten myths around open scholarly publishing" by @Protohedgehog et al.…
RT @FBNBehavPhys: In this week's Journal Club, we will be discussing "Ten myths around open scholarly publishing" by @Protohedgehog et al.…