Ten myths around open scholarly publishing

RT @rscsam: "Think that publishing a preprint will get you scooped? This paper discusses this exact issue: Ten myths around open scholarly…
2447 days ago
RT @Protohedgehog: New at @PeerJPreprints: Ten myths around open scholarly publishing. We want your feedback! What did we get wrong? What c…
RT @Protohedgehog: New at @PeerJPreprints: Ten myths around open scholarly publishing. We want your feedback! What did we get wrong? What c…
RT @rscsam: "Think that publishing a preprint will get you scooped? This paper discusses this exact issue: Ten myths around open scholarly…
RT @rscsam: "Think that publishing a preprint will get you scooped? This paper discusses this exact issue: Ten myths around open scholarly…
RT @rscsam: "Think that publishing a preprint will get you scooped? This paper discusses this exact issue: Ten myths around open scholarly…
RT @Protohedgehog: New at @PeerJPreprints: Ten myths around open scholarly publishing. We want your feedback! What did we get wrong? What c…
2448 days ago
RT @Protohedgehog: New at @PeerJPreprints: Ten myths around open scholarly publishing. We want your feedback! What did we get wrong? What c…
RT @rscsam: "Think that publishing a preprint will get you scooped? This paper discusses this exact issue: Ten myths around open scholarly…
2448 days ago
"Think that publishing a preprint will get you scooped? This paper discusses this exact issue: Ten myths around open scholarly publishing https://t.co/tAcxesH5Vq #UofGRSC19 https://t.co/KshaEJStzg
2448 days ago
RT @Protohedgehog: New at @PeerJPreprints: Ten myths around open scholarly publishing. We want your feedback! What did we get wrong? What c…
RT @Protohedgehog: New at @PeerJPreprints: Ten myths around open scholarly publishing. We want your feedback! What did we get wrong? What c…
RT @Protohedgehog: @edrybicki @Czernie @waltcrawford @hildabast @rmounce @MsPhelps @jeroenbosman I empathise with this, but it's erroneous.…
@edrybicki @Czernie @waltcrawford @hildabast @rmounce @MsPhelps @jeroenbosman I empathise with this, but it's erroneous. There are a number of ways to achieve OA without cost for authors https://t.co/tJsD0qQR31 and also Myth 7 here (page 15) for a bit more discussion https://t.co/zLNLoWqVJh
2455 days ago
RT @FBNBehavPhys: In this week's Journal Club, we will be discussing "Ten myths around open scholarly publishing" by @Protohedgehog et al.…
2456 days ago
Ten myths around open scholarly publishing https://t.co/oBzAprkVQK via @Protohedgehog et al
RT @FBNBehavPhys: In this week's Journal Club, we will be discussing "Ten myths around open scholarly publishing" by @Protohedgehog et al.…
RT @Protohedgehog: Should we be worried about this? Yes. These rankings are not only harmful for research, and based on proprietary data (i…
RT @Protohedgehog: Should we be worried about this? Yes. These rankings are not only harmful for research, and based on proprietary data (i…
RT @Protohedgehog: Should we be worried about this? Yes. These rankings are not only harmful for research, and based on proprietary data (i…
RT @Protohedgehog: New at @PeerJPreprints: Ten myths around open scholarly publishing. We want your feedback! What did we get wrong? What c…
RT @Protohedgehog: Should we be worried about this? Yes. These rankings are not only harmful for research, and based on proprietary data (i…
RT @Protohedgehog: Should we be worried about this? Yes. These rankings are not only harmful for research, and based on proprietary data (i…
RT @Protohedgehog: New at @PeerJPreprints: Ten myths around open scholarly publishing. We want your feedback! What did we get wrong? What c…
RT @Protohedgehog: Should we be worried about this? Yes. These rankings are not only harmful for research, and based on proprietary data (i…