NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

The protein expression of SLC25A1 and Actin

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27494v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Tao Chen conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper.

Lixia Ma contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools.

Jihong Geng contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools.

Yongqing Zeng conceived and designed the experiments, approved the final draft.

Wei Chen conceived and designed the experiments, approved the final draft.

Jingxiang Cui contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools.

Animal Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

This work was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Ethics Committee of Shandong Agricultural University

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Data are provided in a supplemental file.

Funding

This study was supported by the Shandong Provincial Modern Pig Technology and Industry System Project (SDAIT-08-02), Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (ZR2018BC046), and Funds of Shandong “Double Tops” Program (SYL2017YSTD12). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
3 Citations   Views   Downloads