NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Megan D Barnes conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Whitney Goodell performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Robert Whittier performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Kim A Falinski prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Tova Callender conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Hla Htun approved the final draft.

Cecilia LeViol performed the experiments, analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Hudson Slay conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Kirsten L L Oleson conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data is available online and documented in the supplementary materials.

Funding

This work was supported by NOAA CRCP (Grant # NA15NOS4820209), USACE (Grant # W912HZ-15-2-0020) and PICSC (Grant #G15AP00103 and G13AC00361). The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views or policies of the US EPA. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
1 Citation   Views   Downloads