NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Functional distribution of genes between A. salmonicida wild-type and ΔainS mutant at HCD compared to LCD that are ≥2 × differentially expressed

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27443v1/supp-1

Growth curve of LFI1238, luxI-,ΔainS and ΔainSluxI-

The overnight secondary cultures were diluted to a starting OD600 of 0.05 in a total volume of 60 ml SWT. The cultures were grown further in 250 ml baffled flask at 8°C and 220 rpm. The optical density was measured every 4 hours using Ultrospec 10 cell density meter (Amersham Biosciences). The error bars represent the standard deviation of biological triplicates.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27443v1/supp-2

Genes that are ≥2× or ≤ −2× differentially expressed in A. salmonicida luxI- mutant compared to wild-type at low cell density

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27443v1/supp-3

Genes that are ≥2× or ≤ −2× differentially expressed in A. salmonicida luxI- mutant compared to wild-type at high cell density

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27443v1/supp-4

Genes that are ≥2× or ≤ −2× differentially expressed in A. salmonicida ΔainS mutant compared to wild-type at low cell density

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27443v1/supp-5

Genes that are ≥2× or ≤ −2× differentially expressed in A. salmonicida ΔainS mutant compared to wild-type at high cell density

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27443v1/supp-6

Motility zones of LFI1238, luxI-, ΔainS and ΔainSluxI-, formed on soft agar plates

Each value represents the average (mm) of biological triplicates ± standard deviation.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27443v1/supp-7

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Miriam Khider conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft, wrote the paper.

Hilde Hansen conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Jostein A. Johansen contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, approved the final draft, performed HPLC analysis.

Erik Hjerde contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, approved the final draft, analysed the transcriptomics data.

Nils Peder Willassen conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

RNA sequencing data are accessible in the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) under accession numbers PRJEB29457 and PRJEB28385

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJEB29457 and https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJEB28385

Funding

This work was funded by UiT the Arctic University of Norway. The publication charges for this article have been funded by a grant from the publication fund of UiT The Arctic University of Norway. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
  Visitors   Views   Downloads